2019
DOI: 10.33172/jp.v5i3.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Influencing Factors of the Indonesian Maritime Security Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

Abstract: Indonesia has several institutions to maintain maritime defense and security, but maritime security is not only determined by the number of authorized agencies but by many factors. This study aims to assess the factors and sub-factors that affect Indonesian maritime security. To achieve the research objectives, the method used is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with six factors and twenty-nine sub-factors. The process of collecting data through questionnaires and interviews with several experts, the res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only the Port State Control but the maritime conventions such as ISPS (International Ship and Port Security) Code also discussed under the scope of AHP. The AHP indicates that six factors and six sub-factors are affecting Indonesian maritime security, and the Government shall take severe actions for improvement [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only the Port State Control but the maritime conventions such as ISPS (International Ship and Port Security) Code also discussed under the scope of AHP. The AHP indicates that six factors and six sub-factors are affecting Indonesian maritime security, and the Government shall take severe actions for improvement [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an outcome may be measured in terms of the number of vessels it has surveyed/inspected and certified over time, the number of vessel in the class/register of the classification society that have no defects and have shown total compliance with safety standards over time, the number of vessels certified by the classification society whose seaworthiness is marred (deficient and detainable vessels), etc. As earlier identified, the performance and effort of a given classification society affects the safety standards and ratings of ships in its register, the shippers' perception of the seaworthiness of the vessels certified by it, and the overall performance of the classification society with regards to implementation of maritime safety standards (Hozairi et al, 2019;Jones, 2013). This, equally, has implications on the choice and preference of classification society by ship-owners, which may affect the fortunes of the classification society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure efficiency in the implementation of common standards of maritime safety as aforementioned, the IMO developed the PSC instrument after the shipwreck of the AMACO CADIZ in 1978, with the aim of empowering port states to carry out safety surveys and inspections on all vessels that call at their ports, to determine the level of compliance of the vessels with the common safety standards required of a seaworthy vessel [7,8]. Port State Control regimes thus entail a ship inspection process by which coastal nations exercise power and authority over foreign ships in the home ports of the coastal states, carrying out detailed safety inspections on the ships in compliance with the provisions and guidelines of the International Maritime Organization for PSC [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%