2009
DOI: 10.1530/rep-09-0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the LIF-sensitive period for implantation using a LIF-receptor antagonist

Abstract: Uteri of Lif null mice do not support embryo implantation. Since deletion of some genes often prevents the survival of null mice to adulthood, we have used a proven inhibitor of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) signalling to identify the precise window of time during which LIF is required in vivo, and assessed the cellular expression of several LIF-associated targets. On day 4 of pregnancy, mice were injected with hLIF-05 (inhibitor) into the uterine lumen, with corresponding volumes of PBS (vehicle) injected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lif -deficient female mice exhibit implantation failure and supplementation with LIF rescues this defect (Chen et al, 2000; Stewart et al, 1992). Moreover, pharmological blocking LIF action in the uterus significantly reduces the phosphorylation of the downstream signaling molecule signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 in the uterus, resulting in implantation failure (Menkhorst et al, 2011; Mohamet et al, 2009; White et al, 2007). The importance of LIF signaling in implantation is further evidenced by the observations that inactivation of gp130 and STAT3 also causes implantation failure (Catalano et al, 2005; Cheng et al, 2001; Daikoku et al, 2011; Ernst et al, 2001).…”
Section: Uterine Receptivity: Unique Status Of Uterine Differentiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lif -deficient female mice exhibit implantation failure and supplementation with LIF rescues this defect (Chen et al, 2000; Stewart et al, 1992). Moreover, pharmological blocking LIF action in the uterus significantly reduces the phosphorylation of the downstream signaling molecule signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 in the uterus, resulting in implantation failure (Menkhorst et al, 2011; Mohamet et al, 2009; White et al, 2007). The importance of LIF signaling in implantation is further evidenced by the observations that inactivation of gp130 and STAT3 also causes implantation failure (Catalano et al, 2005; Cheng et al, 2001; Daikoku et al, 2011; Ernst et al, 2001).…”
Section: Uterine Receptivity: Unique Status Of Uterine Differentiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LIF-deficient female mice, EGF-like growth factors such as amphiregulin (Ar), heparin binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), and epiregulin (Ereg) were not expressed at the site of blastocyst apposition [36], although expressions of EGF receptors were not affected [36]. The dependency of Ar on LIF was evident from lack of expression of this growth factor in uterine luminal epithelia following administration of inhibitor to LIF (hLIF-05) [37]. LIF was also required to induce expression of implantation genes including Msx-1 and Wnt-4 [38].…”
Section: Lif Role In Uterine Transformation Into a Receptive Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in women, in mice decidualization of ESC occurs post-implantation. LIF −/− female mice do not undergo artificial decidualization [14] and intraluminal administration of a short-acting LIF inhibitor during the peri-implantation period results in less extensive desmin filaments (decidual marker) than in the control mice [15]. Further, intraluminal injections of LIF into Fox2a null females partially rescues the formation of a deciduoma during artificial decidualization [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%