2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the mechanical properties of electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofibers using AFM and a novel fiber anchoring technique

Abstract: Due to its low cost, biocompatibility and slow bioresorption, poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) continues to be a suitable material for select biomedical engineering applications. We used a combined atomic force microscopy (AFM)/optical microscopy technique to determine key mechanical properties of individual electrospun PCL nanofibers with diameters between 440-1040nm. Compared to protein nanofibers, PCL nanofibers showed much lower adhesion, as they slipped on the substrate when mechanically manipulated. We, therefo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
106
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AFM measurements were performed in dry conditions, which is different from the cells’ wet environment. While it is expected that the mechanical properties of elastin may change in wet conditions, we expect that the values of elastic modulus in wet conditions may be lower than in air for all types of electrospun scaffolds that we fabricated, as reported elsewhere [7374]; however, the trend is expected to be conserved [7374]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…AFM measurements were performed in dry conditions, which is different from the cells’ wet environment. While it is expected that the mechanical properties of elastin may change in wet conditions, we expect that the values of elastic modulus in wet conditions may be lower than in air for all types of electrospun scaffolds that we fabricated, as reported elsewhere [7374]; however, the trend is expected to be conserved [7374]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These are however all time-consuming methods which require a high degree of precision, coupled with the fact that it remains difficult to manipulate single fibers within these test rigs. The most common methods of nanofiber tensile testing include the use of atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilevers,174-176 3-point bending testing [177][178][179] or commercial nano-tensile testing. 38,127 The AFM testing method essentially relies on the fixing of fibers to the ends of the AFM cantilever before applying a tensile load.…”
Section: Fiber Diametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, electrospinning is one of the most cost-effective methods for producing nonwoven nanofibrous mats from various polymers including chitosan (CS) [7], chitosan-gelatin [8], poly(lactic-co-glycolide) [9], sodium alginate [10], poly--caprolactone [11], collagen [12] and polyurethane [13]. The nanofiber mats have important properties including small fiber size, extremely large specific surface, high porosity and low fabric weight which are favorable for drug release, absorbency, wound dressing, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, food coating and food packaging [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%