2018
DOI: 10.1101/375378
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Mutation Bias of Favipiravir in Influenza Using Next-generation Sequencing

Abstract: 11Favipiravir is a broad spectrum antiviral drug that may be used to treat influenza. Previous 12 research has identified that favipiravir likely acts as a mutagen but the precise mutation bias 13 that favipiravir induces in influenza virus RNAs has not been described. Here, we use next-14 generation sequencing (NGS) with barcoding of individual RNA molecules to accurately and 15 quantitatively detect favipiravir-induced mutations and to sample orders of magnitude 16 more mutations than would be possible throu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, theoretical resistant mutants should be generated but are unable to replicate or replicate with reduced fidelity to replace the entire virus population. The favipiravir-resistant mutant replicates as an artificially generated clone but does not become dominant among the entire virus population that grows in the presence of favipiravir (Abdelnabi, et al, 2017;Delang, et al, 2014;Goldhill, et al, 2019). Our results are consistent with the absence of a resistant virus in the entire virus population treated with favipiravir.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Generation Of Resistant Herpesvirus And Insupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, theoretical resistant mutants should be generated but are unable to replicate or replicate with reduced fidelity to replace the entire virus population. The favipiravir-resistant mutant replicates as an artificially generated clone but does not become dominant among the entire virus population that grows in the presence of favipiravir (Abdelnabi, et al, 2017;Delang, et al, 2014;Goldhill, et al, 2019). Our results are consistent with the absence of a resistant virus in the entire virus population treated with favipiravir.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Generation Of Resistant Herpesvirus And Insupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Favipiravir treatment increases the frequency of transition (Delang, et al, 2014;Goldhill, et al, 2019;Vanderlinden, et al, 2016) and transversion (Baranovich, et al, 2013) in viral genomes, and these mutations are hypothesized to be caused by favipiravir, resulting in lethal mutagenesis (Baranovich, et al, 2013;Delang, et al, 2014;Goldhill, et al, 2019;Vanderlinden, et al, 2016). We observed a transition of influenza virus and poliovirus in cultures treated with favipiravir but did not assess the frequency because we were unable to J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof compare the transition rate with the proper antiviral agents with similar mechanisms as a control Daikoku, Yoshida, Okuda, & Shiraki, 2014).…”
Section: Increased Number Of Mutations In Viral Genomes In Favipiravimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We and others have shown that favipiravir induces mutations in the viral genome ( 25 , 36 ). One possible mechanism by which the K229R mutation might confer resistance to favipiravir would be to increase the fidelity of the polymerase, as has been observed for ribavirin resistance in several viral systems ( 37 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Favipiravir (T-705) is a broad-spectrum RNA virus inhibitor that is currently licensed in Japan for stock-piling against pandemic influenza viruses resistant to oseltamivir. T-705 has been shown to be effective against Ebola virus, also within order Mononegavirales and therefore was considered for use against RABV also [175][176][177][178][179][180][181]. When tested in mouse neuroblastoma neural 2a cells, T-705 indeed lowered RABV titers by three to four order of magnitude (EC 50 of 32.4 μM against a circulating RABV strain and 44.3 μM against the vaccine strain).…”
Section: Direct-acting Antiviralsmentioning
confidence: 99%