2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In concordance with a previous study 19 , our results showed a greater underestimation of NOC when there is a 30% allele dropout rate than would be observed with no allele dropouts 19 . Since the SE33 locus 20 , 21 was able to reduce the NOC underestimation risk in a no-allele dropout scenario 2 , we investigated whether SE33 locus can similarly reduce NOC underestimation risk in a mixture profile with 30% allele dropout.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In concordance with a previous study 19 , our results showed a greater underestimation of NOC when there is a 30% allele dropout rate than would be observed with no allele dropouts 19 . Since the SE33 locus 20 , 21 was able to reduce the NOC underestimation risk in a no-allele dropout scenario 2 , we investigated whether SE33 locus can similarly reduce NOC underestimation risk in a mixture profile with 30% allele dropout.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With such a method, the true NOC is uncertain, especially with high order mixtures (three or more) and/or low levels of DNA [64][65][66]. It is difficult to refer to the true NOC even in mock samples, but we will define it here as the number of donors that have left some signal above the analytical threshold.…”
Section: Number Of Contributors (Noc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some suggestions were made for validation of PGS systems [ 87 ], and several validation studies were published for the PGS system STRmix including a developmental validation by the developers [ 88 ], an FBI Laboratory internal validation [ 89 ], and a 31-laboratory compilation of 2825 mixture results [ 90 ]. A machine learning-based assessment for estimating the number of contributors was described [ 91 ], and the challenges of estimating the number of contributors with low levels of DNA were explored [ 92 ]. Variation of results with four different continuous PGS models were studied [ 93 ] and responses to court admissibility challenges with STRmix were provided [ 94 ].…”
Section: Dna Mixture Interpretation and Probabilistic Genotyping Softmentioning
confidence: 99%