2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Optimal Time Interval between Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration and Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, women reported a greater satisfaction (p < 0.001) and the hysteroscope insertion through the cervical canal was easier (p = 0.003) and faster (p < 0.001) in group with a long-interval dinoprostone rather than the short-interval group. The prevalence of side effects was found similar in both groups [42].…”
Section: Pharmacological Strategiessupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, women reported a greater satisfaction (p < 0.001) and the hysteroscope insertion through the cervical canal was easier (p = 0.003) and faster (p < 0.001) in group with a long-interval dinoprostone rather than the short-interval group. The prevalence of side effects was found similar in both groups [42].…”
Section: Pharmacological Strategiessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…[42] Dinoprostone 3 mg of dinoprostone vaginally located 12 h before the office hysteroscopic procedure Hameed and Farhan[43] Haghighi et al[46] Issat et al[44] Gokmen Karasu et al[45] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%