2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.438-439.1414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Pile Bearing Capacity by the Curve Match Method of High Strain Dynamic Testing

Abstract: This paper determines the bearing capacity of pile and shaft resistance by the curve match method of high strain dynamic testing. By the comparison of bearing capacity of pile between the testing results of static loading and dynamic high strain, the reliability and surveying precision of the curve match method is analyzed, and the error sources and reasons are explored, to reasonably determine the design parameters of pile foundation engineering.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org location and the time t 2 is designated as the time when the toe reflected impact wave returns to the sensor location (t 2 is equal to t 1 plus 2 L/c) (Green and Kightley, 2005a;Zhao, 2005;Ding et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org location and the time t 2 is designated as the time when the toe reflected impact wave returns to the sensor location (t 2 is equal to t 1 plus 2 L/c) (Green and Kightley, 2005a;Zhao, 2005;Ding et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains a computer-based program for data acquisition and analysis at the field from the case method (Zhao, 2005). The Case Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP) is applied for an analysis to correlate the dynamic to static capacity of the piles (Ding et al, 2013). It executes the analysis based on the concept of stress wave propagation with signal matching method to find a reasonable solution (Green and Kightley, 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%