2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the relationship of thermal conductivity and compressional wave velocity of common rock types as a basis for reservoir characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal conductivity of the rocks depends not only on mineralogical composition and microstructure (porosity, fracture density, texture), but also on pressure, rock temperature and degree of saturation and nature of the fluid. The effect of those parameters on thermal conductivity have been largely investigated by previous studies, which showed that the thermal conductivity of rocks generally decreases with increasing porosity (Woodside and Messmer 1961;Popov et al 2003;Nagaraju and Roy 2014;Guo et al 2017;Mielke et al 2017), whereas pressure tends to reduce porosity, close (micro)cracks and improve heat transport at grain-grain contacts and, thus, increase thermal conductivity (Walsh and Decker 1966;Abdulagatova et al 2009;Schön and Dasgupta 2015). On the contrary, high temperature tends to decrease the thermal conductivity of rocks due to differential thermal expansion of the minerals, which may increase contact resistances between the grains and result in thermal cracking creating porosity (Vosteen and Schellschmidt 2003;Abdulagatov et al 2006;Abdulagatova et al 2009;Guo et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivity of the rocks depends not only on mineralogical composition and microstructure (porosity, fracture density, texture), but also on pressure, rock temperature and degree of saturation and nature of the fluid. The effect of those parameters on thermal conductivity have been largely investigated by previous studies, which showed that the thermal conductivity of rocks generally decreases with increasing porosity (Woodside and Messmer 1961;Popov et al 2003;Nagaraju and Roy 2014;Guo et al 2017;Mielke et al 2017), whereas pressure tends to reduce porosity, close (micro)cracks and improve heat transport at grain-grain contacts and, thus, increase thermal conductivity (Walsh and Decker 1966;Abdulagatova et al 2009;Schön and Dasgupta 2015). On the contrary, high temperature tends to decrease the thermal conductivity of rocks due to differential thermal expansion of the minerals, which may increase contact resistances between the grains and result in thermal cracking creating porosity (Vosteen and Schellschmidt 2003;Abdulagatov et al 2006;Abdulagatova et al 2009;Guo et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will extend the opportunity to also use the database to derive phenomenological constitutive models for petrophysical rock properties from their chemical or mineralogical composition (Chopra et al, 2018, Gard et al, 2019 or from their microstructure (Pimienta et al, 2014) or to develop empirical correlations between distinct properties of certain rock types (Gegenhuber and Schön, 2012, Esteban et al, 2015, Mielke et al, 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever possible, all parameters were measured on each plug or rock sample for direct correlation. The rock samples were classified after Norini et al (2015) and Avellán et al (2017) into (1) Post-caldera volcanism, (2) Caldera volcanism, (3) Pre-caldera volcanism and (4) Basement and Intrusive rocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proceq device along different directions on the sample surfaces in order to identify anisotropy and the effect of fractures. The combined measurement of both P-and S-wave velocity offers the opportunity to retrieve elastic mechanical parameters like Poisson ratio, Young's modulus and G modulus (Mielke et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%