2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the spatial scale for conservation purposes – an example with grizzly bears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of sampling windows of varying sizes has proven effective in determining habitat use of different species (martens-Mowat 2006; grizzly bears [Ursus arctos]- Nams et al 2006) and should provide an appropriate sampling strategy for this investigation. We used the camera location as the sampling point for the site-specific scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of sampling windows of varying sizes has proven effective in determining habitat use of different species (martens-Mowat 2006; grizzly bears [Ursus arctos]- Nams et al 2006) and should provide an appropriate sampling strategy for this investigation. We used the camera location as the sampling point for the site-specific scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the strong overlap between the AHR and areas already recognised as potentially important (Pippard & Malcolm 1978, Michaud 1993 underlines that these areas likely serve special purposes for this population. The approach developed here also defined AHR according to scales and cell sizes that are meaningful in the context of conservation or definition of management units (Nams et al 2006). Identifying areas where individuals spent time, such as the AHR, could further be important in understanding and measuring the effects of factors limiting population growth.…”
Section: îLe Du Bicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the scale dependency of variables on species fitness is important for conservation planning. Since species' fitness needs may differ with scale, investigations limited to a singular scale may fail to recognize the importance of key habitat components (Nams, Mowat & Panian, 2006). For instance, Ciarniello, Boyce, Seip & Heard (2007) demonstrated how delineating protected areas for grizzly bears, Ursus arctos, based on habitat selection at the third-order would have excluded important landscape features whose importance only became evident at the home-range scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%