2006
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2005.858807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Test Voltage Factor Function for the Evaluation of Lightning Impulses With Oscillations and/or an Overshoot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) These results are compared with the K-factor function expressed by (3) and the test results in the European Project [14] (3) Fig. 10 indicates the evaluation results of the K-factor values in the present experiment using the proposed method, together with the results for positive polarity and the results in the European Project.…”
Section: Discussion On K-factor Valuesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(2) These results are compared with the K-factor function expressed by (3) and the test results in the European Project [14] (3) Fig. 10 indicates the evaluation results of the K-factor values in the present experiment using the proposed method, together with the results for positive polarity and the results in the European Project.…”
Section: Discussion On K-factor Valuesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As for the k -factor values, the measurement results in the European Project ("E.P.") were reported in the past and the uncertainty evaluated [28]. This result was apparently accompanied by significant uncertainty.…”
Section: Uncertainty In K-factor Measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The IEC 60060‐2 “High‐voltage test technique—Part 2: Measuring system” specifies evaluation of measurement uncertainty as one of the aspects of performance to be included in the system for measuring a high‐voltage test. As for the k ‐factor values, the measurement results in the European Project (“E.P.”) were reported in the past and the uncertainty evaluated [28]. This result was apparently accompanied by significant uncertainty.…”
Section: Insulating Test For Electric Power Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the iteration process of the Levenberg-Marquardt method has a long execution time for some waveforms with a high overshoot rate. (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) There have been some attempts to overcome this problem. The double integration approach with weight functions (16) and the improved Prony method (17) have been proposed, although complicated calculations are required in these approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%