2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Zeta Potential of Porous Membranes Using Electrolyte Conductivity inside Pores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overlapping double layers hinder the transport of ions through the pores. Only surface conduction will be possible, if the overlap and the blockage of the pores are ideal [18]. Finally, the variation in the reflection coefficient, σ , which is the degree of semipermeability of the membrane, is again very small; cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlapping double layers hinder the transport of ions through the pores. Only surface conduction will be possible, if the overlap and the blockage of the pores are ideal [18]. Finally, the variation in the reflection coefficient, σ , which is the degree of semipermeability of the membrane, is again very small; cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather surprisingly, the streaming potential [not the streaming current, (van der Heyden et al 2005)] has not widely employed in the characterization of nanopores in spite of its relative experimental simplicity and considerable use in the case of porous membranes (Kontturi et al 1994;Huisman et al 2000;Cervera et al 2001b;Fievet et al 2001).…”
Section: Streaming Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used techniques are electrophoresis and streaming potential. The former allows the characterization of the electrokinetic properties of particles, whereas the latter can be applied to particles (2) as well as massive materials (3)(4)(5). The main factor that tends to make electrophoresis less suitable than streaming potential is its restrictions of particle size (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%