2000
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
3,848
0
159

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,682 publications
(4,018 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
3,848
0
159
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this, audio transcripts were sent to some participants to review and confirm whether their views had been well represented. This, according to Creswell and Miller (2000), enhances the quality of data for reporting the findings of the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on this, audio transcripts were sent to some participants to review and confirm whether their views had been well represented. This, according to Creswell and Miller (2000), enhances the quality of data for reporting the findings of the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using the set definitions and inclusion/ exclusion criteria, three coders completed a second-cycle coding of the data [25,26]. Coders met to discuss any ambiguous data or non-agreement codes, and preliminary findings were debriefed with the research team to confirm findings [23,27]. Detailed and reflective memos regarding data analysis were maintained to document all intervention adaptation research decisions [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we were intensely engaged in the research, conducting multiple reads of the transcripts, met for several months to address discrepancies in the coding process, and ensured that our analyses and interpretations were rooted in the data. Third, we used bracketing to ensure that our assumptions and beliefs did not influence our analysis ( Creswell & Miller, 2000). This included writing memos throughout data analyses and reflecting on how we engaged the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%