Day 1 Tue, October 20, 2015 2015
DOI: 10.2118/175943-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Well-to-Well Connectivity in Tight Reservoirs

Abstract: Drilling and fracture stimulating horizontal wells in economically marginal fields, such as tight oil reservoirs, is a common practice. Estimating the connectivity between these wells (IWC) is important for the design and management of a field when waterflood recovery is applied. For example, IWC affects the determination of fracture conductivity and length and can help identify favorable locations for infill drilling and optimize injection rates.Numerical simulators, such as streamline simulation need a geolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important to emphasize that the CRM-derived interwell connectivities are mainly related to the pressure support while streamlines allocation factors are related to the fraction of injected fluid flowing towards a producer. As recently exemplified and discussed by Mirzayev et al [48] for waterflooding in tight reservoirs and by Holanda et al [33] for conventional reservoirs, these differences can be further explored when studying the distribution of flow paths and barriers in the reservoir.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Crm Interwell Connectivities With Streamline mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, it is important to emphasize that the CRM-derived interwell connectivities are mainly related to the pressure support while streamlines allocation factors are related to the fraction of injected fluid flowing towards a producer. As recently exemplified and discussed by Mirzayev et al [48] for waterflooding in tight reservoirs and by Holanda et al [33] for conventional reservoirs, these differences can be further explored when studying the distribution of flow paths and barriers in the reservoir.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Crm Interwell Connectivities With Streamline mentioning
confidence: 97%