2014 Fourth International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications (DICTAP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/dictap.2014.6821657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic network coding over Long Term Evaluation Advance communication system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 4, we can see that Two-Source NC outperforms N = 50 system by 1 dB of 10 −5 MSNC [11], but when applied CPNC for the N = 50, the BER im- Finally, we can notice clearly in Figure 4 as well, that the more we increase L, the nearer the performance improves towards to AF b as direct transmission needs no sequential network decoding steps. Figure 5 shows that increasing the number of the combined packets (L) has much better BER results than increasing the number of the additional transmitted CMPs, as sending 49 extra CMs in MSNC (which means doubling the data rate) improves the BER by 0.6 dB [15], while in CPNC, when L = 49, the BER performance improves significantly with no extra data rate, we can claim that when L = 49, in CPNC there is around 2 dB improvement at almost the same data rate, which is 1/LN less than pure broadcasting, while the performance is just 0.6 dB with double data rate in MSNC based on NC of bits independently per unit time setups.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 4, we can see that Two-Source NC outperforms N = 50 system by 1 dB of 10 −5 MSNC [11], but when applied CPNC for the N = 50, the BER im- Finally, we can notice clearly in Figure 4 as well, that the more we increase L, the nearer the performance improves towards to AF b as direct transmission needs no sequential network decoding steps. Figure 5 shows that increasing the number of the combined packets (L) has much better BER results than increasing the number of the additional transmitted CMPs, as sending 49 extra CMs in MSNC (which means doubling the data rate) improves the BER by 0.6 dB [15], while in CPNC, when L = 49, the BER performance improves significantly with no extra data rate, we can claim that when L = 49, in CPNC there is around 2 dB improvement at almost the same data rate, which is 1/LN less than pure broadcasting, while the performance is just 0.6 dB with double data rate in MSNC based on NC of bits independently per unit time setups.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In [11], NC has been applied over Long Term Evaluation Advanced (LTE-A) mobile network over three BSs with a different algorithm for each BS, resulting to such high Packet Error Probability (PEP) improvement compared to the same system, when NC technique is not implemented, i.e., (Benchmark scenario).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], CoNC was applied over an erasure channel for the application of Long Term Evaluation mobile network, and it shows how the network performance improved significantly mainly in term of power consumption and data rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] [3] and [4], the influence of improving the routing protocols over communications network was presented for broadcasting network to show how choosing the proper protocol algorithm improves the network performance, so, in [2], combining the transmitted packets resulted to much less transmission traffic over a lossy channel network and in [3] over the physical layer with introducing the Bet Error Rate (BER) for the combined network. In [4], improving the transmission protocols over the long term evaluation advanced communication system resulted to much better Packet Error Probability (PEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%