2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2016.7541559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic performance analysis of subspace methods for cisoid parameter estimation

Abstract: Performance analyses of subspace algorithms for cisoid parameter estimation available in the literature are predominantly of statistical nature with a focus on asymptoticeither in the sample size or the SNR-statements. This paper presents a deterministic, finite sample size, and finite-SNR performance analysis of the ESPRIT algorithm and the matrix pencil method. Our results are based, inter alia, on a new upper bound on the condition number of Vandermonde matrices with nodes inside the unit disk. This bound i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the stability analysis of subspace methods, there have been works on bounding the error in terms of the minimum singular value of Vandermonde matrices. Such inequalities can be found in [28,25] for MUSIC and in [15,1] for ESPRIT, as well as in [30] for the matrix pencil method. One major roadblock for this approach is that accurate bounds for the smallest singular value in the ∆ ≤ 1/M regime were not readily available.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the stability analysis of subspace methods, there have been works on bounding the error in terms of the minimum singular value of Vandermonde matrices. Such inequalities can be found in [28,25] for MUSIC and in [15,1] for ESPRIT, as well as in [30] for the matrix pencil method. One major roadblock for this approach is that accurate bounds for the smallest singular value in the ∆ ≤ 1/M regime were not readily available.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This difficulty was addressed in [25], which provided the first accurate analysis of MUSIC in the ∆ ≤ 1/M regime. As for ESPRIT, the bounds in [15,1] do not capture the exact dependence of the error on the minimum singular value, and consequently, are inaccurate when ∆ ≤ 1/M (see (3.6) and (3.7) and the discussion there).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common findings are that the estimation error for the location parameter {t j } p−1 j=0 and the magnitude a j,l are bounded by the condition number of the confluent Vandermonde matrix as well as the minimum separation distance ∆. Moreover, matrix pencil approaches such as Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Techniques (ESPRIT) method [39] is shown to stably recovery the locations [33], [38].…”
Section: F Recovery Of Continuous Domain Fri Signals After Interpolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 for an illustration. 1 If we use 2M moments, we see directly by (2) that the moments are entire functions of the M nodes and M weights such that the inverse mapping theorem gives local smoothness of the Prony-map around every point where the Jacobian of the mapping from the moments to the parameters has non-vanishing determinant. As the determinant is analytic, we have local smoothness of the Prony-map almost everywhere.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Known Stability Of Subspace Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ(X) = 1, and denote the set of probability-like measures on T by M(T). 2 For some specified minimal weight c min > 0 and minimal separation q > 0, we consider the set of measures…”
Section: Preliminaries and Known Stability Of Subspace Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%