2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45022-x_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic Radio Broadcasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A general Ω(D log n) lower bound is proven in [9], even for the case where D = Ω(n), while a trivial upper bound is O(n 2 ). In a sequence of works [10,11,15,17] the upper bound has been improved to O(n log 2 n) [15]. Other deterministic protocols include [8,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general Ω(D log n) lower bound is proven in [9], even for the case where D = Ω(n), while a trivial upper bound is O(n 2 ). In a sequence of works [10,11,15,17] the upper bound has been improved to O(n log 2 n) [15]. Other deterministic protocols include [8,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in a fault-prone situation, it is impossible to use broadcasting algorithms which are designed for fault-free networks and which rely on the knowledge of topology, such as, e.g, [6,11]. However, the question arises if broadcasting algorithms designed for fault-free networks of unknown topology [2,8,9] should be used in a potentially faulty known network. The answer seems to depend on whether we allow randomization.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is shown by Clementi et al [6] that any deterministic broadcasting algorithms for general unknown network require time. Chlebus et al [4] give an algorithm with running time ; Chrobak et al [5] design an almost optimal algorithm of running time ; and the best known algorithm is given by Czumaj and Rytter which runs in time [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%