2018
DOI: 10.2172/1635786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterring Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century: The Challenge for the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected several audio datasets to make data augmentation, such as the ESC-50 dataset (Piczak, 2015) and the Speech Commands Data Set (Warden, 2018). All cough data comes from the ESC-50 dataset.…”
Section: Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected several audio datasets to make data augmentation, such as the ESC-50 dataset (Piczak, 2015) and the Speech Commands Data Set (Warden, 2018). All cough data comes from the ESC-50 dataset.…”
Section: Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Still, the theory of threatening limited nuclear escalation in response to conventional attack remains influential among nuclear strategists. 39 Pakistan's 'asymmetric escalation' strategy is a prominent example of this today threatening rapid nuclear retaliation in response to any Indian conventional attack. 40 The conventional inferiority thesis rests on two implicit assumptions that can be questioned.…”
Section: A Conventional Balance Of Forces Thesis Of Nuclear Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Korean War played an important role in defining the new strategic war context established at the beginning of the Cold War (Halperin, 1963;Jervis, 1980;Rapport, 2015;Warden, 2018) . Before the Korean War, the aim of the war had been total victory against enemies; however, the emergence of nuclear power and the development and growth of conventional weapons limited the total war.…”
Section: Limited War As a Wartime Strategy Between The Superpowersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential use of atomic weapons itself, by its nature, has begun to emerge as a new dimension in the reality of war. When the US lost its nuclear monopoly in August 1949, states have not been able to use the atomic weapon against each other as a requirement of the balance of terror (Halperin, 1963;Jervis, 1980;Rapport, 2015;Warden, 2018;Sweeney, 2007). In this case, the basic question arised was how would states give the struggle.…”
Section: The Difference the War Made: Its Implications For Future Warmentioning
confidence: 99%