2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-005-0262-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detonation diffraction from circular tubes to cones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
16
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some computed solutions are compared with other works in Table 4. The minimum induction zone length was found to be 15 mm in the present computations, which is pretty close to the result (0.147 cm) by Joseph et al [33] while a little small than the result (0.16 cm) by Qu [34]; nevertheless, much larger than the reported value (2.0×10 3 cm)by Oran et al [35].…”
Section: One-dimensional Detonationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Some computed solutions are compared with other works in Table 4. The minimum induction zone length was found to be 15 mm in the present computations, which is pretty close to the result (0.147 cm) by Joseph et al [33] while a little small than the result (0.16 cm) by Qu [34]; nevertheless, much larger than the reported value (2.0×10 3 cm)by Oran et al [35].…”
Section: One-dimensional Detonationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[14][15][16] or a cone-shaped exit with a gradual area change that reduces lateral expansion. [17][18][19][20] To enhance the transmission efficiency of the pre-detonator, a combination method using a "reflector" and "overfilling" of the driver gas was proposed in references 21) and 22), as shown in Fig. 1(b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsequent experimental studies showed that d c = 13 is not realized, as reviewed in [13]. Many methods for enhancing the detonation transition at the abrupt change of area have been proposed, and typical methods include the use of 1) shock reflection and shock-focusing devices [14][15][16] and 2) a cone-shaped exit with a gradual area change that reduces the lateral expansion [12,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%