2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-021-02464-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrimental effects of a failed infection by a co-invasive parasite on a native congeneric parasite and its native host

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data showed that in squirrels of both sexes, the probability of surviving over the next twelve months was negatively related to S. robustus egg counts, indicating a negative effect of the alien parasite on local red squirrel survival. It is widely assumed that spillover of an alien parasite from an invading to a closely-related native species will be severely detrimental to the new host, because the naïve species will represent a physiologically similar host, but lack any coevolved tolerance or resistance to the parasite (Prenter et al 2004;Strauss et al 2012;McIntire and Juliano 2021). However, despite such host-switching events appear to be relatively common in biological invasions, studies demonstrating the pathogenic effect of alien macroparasites on native animal hosts, particularly mammals, are surprisingly few and only in a handful of cases the impact on naïve hosts was found to be higher than on the natural host, supporting the occurrence of parasite-mediated competition (see Lymbery et al 2014 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data showed that in squirrels of both sexes, the probability of surviving over the next twelve months was negatively related to S. robustus egg counts, indicating a negative effect of the alien parasite on local red squirrel survival. It is widely assumed that spillover of an alien parasite from an invading to a closely-related native species will be severely detrimental to the new host, because the naïve species will represent a physiologically similar host, but lack any coevolved tolerance or resistance to the parasite (Prenter et al 2004;Strauss et al 2012;McIntire and Juliano 2021). However, despite such host-switching events appear to be relatively common in biological invasions, studies demonstrating the pathogenic effect of alien macroparasites on native animal hosts, particularly mammals, are surprisingly few and only in a handful of cases the impact on naïve hosts was found to be higher than on the natural host, supporting the occurrence of parasite-mediated competition (see Lymbery et al 2014 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, invading hosts will likely introduce at least some parasite species from their native range and these alien parasites may spill-over to a susceptible native species (Power and Mitchell 2004;Telfer and Bown 2012). It is widely assumed that such shared parasites may then mediate the competition between the two species: if the alien parasite has a greater impact on the naïve species than on the invader, the latter will gain a competitive advantage and the probability of a successful invasion will increase (disease-mediated invasions) (Strauss et al 2012;McIntire and Juliano 2021). Finally, alien species may also acquire local parasites, amplifying (spillback: Kelly et al 2009;Sherrard-Smith et al 2015) or diluting their circulation (dilution effect: Thieltges et al 2009;Telfer and Brown 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oocyst prevalence and abundance in the water were quantified (Fellous and Koella 2009, McIntire and Juliano 2021), yielding our measures of oocyst prevalence (proportion of adults and deceased pupae bearing oocysts) and oocyst infection intensity (oocysts per infected adult or deceased pupa). Oocyst production for individuals that died as pupae was included in this analysis, as late pupal death can result in successful completion of the parasite life cycle (Chen 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental variables within a parasite's invasive range may impact its growth and life cycle, and thereby influence how parasites affect their novel hosts (e.g., Cline et al 2014;Liu et al 2021). Novel hosts exert unique selection pressures on invasive parasites that may lead to altered host-parasite dynamics (Telfer and Bown 2012;McIntire and Juliano 2021) via shifts in parasite strategy and population genetic structure (Brown et al 2009;Emde et al 2014;Beaurepaire et al 2019). Long-term studies of parasite invasions are critical for identifying evolutionary changes within introduced populations, which may be consequential for the conservation and survival of vulnerable host species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found that P. downsi shows little evidence for genetic differentiation across five islands in the Galápagos archipelago (Santa Cruz, Floreana, Isabela, Santiago and San Cristobal) and across the lowland and highland habitats (Dudaniec et al 2008a;Koop et al 2020), indicative of moderate to high genetic dispersal. However, given strong selection pressures associated with invasion (Le Roux 2021), genetic drift in small founding populations (Polechová 2018), and interactions with multiple novel hosts (Telfer and Bown 2012;McIntire and Juliano 2021), P. downsi is expected to show evolutionary shifts since its introduction. Further, previous research detected morphological changes in P. downsi, with an ~ 11% decrease in female body length and a ~ 26% decrease in female abdomen size between 2004-2016, the latter trait being strongly correlated with fecundity (Common et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%