Detrimental Effects of Workplace Bullying: Impediment of Self-Management Competence via Psychological Distress

Abstract

Emotional intelligence has been linked to various positive outcomes, such as organizational effectiveness, commitment, morale, and health. In addition, longitudinal studies demonstrate that the competencies of emotional intelligence may change and be developed over time. Researchers have argued that work relationships are important for the development of emotional competence, but their usefulness depends on the quality of the relationship. Workplace bullying is considered to be one of the most stressful phenomena in the workplace and an example of a dysfunctional and toxic relationship that has detrimental effects on an individual’s physical and psychological health. Hence, the objective of the present study was to analyze the relationship linking workplace bullying, psychological distress and the self-management competence of emotional intelligence. More specifically, we tested part of the model presented by Cherniss and Goleman (2001) in which researchers argued that individual emotional intelligence is a result of relationships at work. In addition, we extended the model by proposing that the relationship between exposure to workplace bullying and the competence of self-management is explained by psychological distress. Data analysis of 326 participants from two private sector organizations in Italy demonstrated that psychological distress fully mediated the relationship between workplace bullying and the emotional intelligence ability of self-management. The present study’s findings point to the idea that, not only may emotional intelligence assist in handling exposure to workplace bullying, but exposure to workplace bullying may impede emotional intelligence via psychological distress.

Positive Relational Management for Healthy Organizations: Psychometric Properties of a New Scale for Prevention for Workers

“…It is therefore important to create a positive workplace relational environment to enable workers to increase their personal resources ( World Medical Association [WMA], 2013 ; Boyatzis et al, 2002 , 2015 ; Boyatzis and Saatcioglu, 2008 ; Di Fabio and Bernaud, 2008 ; Boyatzis, 2009 ; Di Fabio and Maree, 2012 ; Rehfuss and Di Fabio, 2012 ; Di Fabio, 2014a , 2016b ; Giorgi et al, 2014 , 2015a , b , 2016 ; Di Fabio and Palazzeschi, 2015b ; Di Fabio and Gori, 2016a , b ) so that they can enhance their well-being ( Snyder et al, 2014 ; Di Fabio and Kenny, 2016a ). This study presents new ways to conceptualize organizational relationality ( Di Fabio, 2015b ; Di Fabio and Gori, 2016a , b ) to promote gainful employment and life ( Di Fabio, 2014a , 2015b ), as well as to create healthy organizations and healthy businesses.…”

The Working Environment as a Platform for the Promotion of Active Aging: An Italian Overview

“…An appropriate active aging program provides a motivational stimulation among older workers. The result is an improvement of workers' psychophysical wellbeing with the consequent reduction in absenteeism, accidents and limitations on work [26,27]. Another long-term effect could be an increase in the number of workers who voluntarily choose to remain in service once they reach the retirement age.…”

Well-Being and Functioning at Work Following Thefts and Robberies: A Comparative Study

“…Accordingly, workers affected by violence reported impediments in self-management, a factor related to self-efficacy (Giorgi et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, CSE might be impaired by the level of stress perceived during or immediately after the trauma (Bosmans and van der Velden, 2015 ; Bosmans et al, 2015c ).…”