2018
DOI: 10.1002/gj.3315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrital zircon record of Mesozoic volcanic arcs in the Lower Cretaceous Mural Limestone, northwestern Mexico

Abstract: The northwestern part of Mexico, southern Arizona, and southern California witnessed extensive arc magmatism during Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous. Here, we present results from petrography, whole‐rock geochemistry (major and trace including rare‐earth elements), and detrital zircon geochronological studies that were carried out on sandstones and shales of the Mural Limestone exposed in the Rancho Bufalo area. Based on the petrography, sandstones are classified as sublitharenite, litharenite, feldspathic li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(190 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zircon is a common accessory mineral in clastic sediments, which retains U-Pb isotopic signatures during erosion, recycling, and transport; differences in zircon age populations in sediments are linked to the nature and age of source terranes (Ji et al 2019;Joy et al 2019;Liu et al 2019;Chaudhuri et al 2020). Hence, detrital zircon U-Pb age geochronology is reliable to infer provenance, as well as helpful to discriminate sediments derived from various source terranes and to understand their sediment-transport pathways (An et al 2016;Madhavaraju et al 2018;Wang et al 2018a). Although U-Pb ages of detrital zircons have been used widely in different studies to investigate sediment provenance, few studies recommended that the combination of zircon age data and trace element data is more reliable to better understand the depositional history of a complex depositional basin (Wang et al 2017;Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zircon is a common accessory mineral in clastic sediments, which retains U-Pb isotopic signatures during erosion, recycling, and transport; differences in zircon age populations in sediments are linked to the nature and age of source terranes (Ji et al 2019;Joy et al 2019;Liu et al 2019;Chaudhuri et al 2020). Hence, detrital zircon U-Pb age geochronology is reliable to infer provenance, as well as helpful to discriminate sediments derived from various source terranes and to understand their sediment-transport pathways (An et al 2016;Madhavaraju et al 2018;Wang et al 2018a). Although U-Pb ages of detrital zircons have been used widely in different studies to investigate sediment provenance, few studies recommended that the combination of zircon age data and trace element data is more reliable to better understand the depositional history of a complex depositional basin (Wang et al 2017;Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geochemical value of the clastic sediments is dominantly used to ascertain the source area and structural setting (Cullers, 1995;McLennan, 1993;Armstrong-Altrin et al, 2004;Armstrong-Altrin et al, 2012;Armstrong-Altrin, 2015;Zaid, 2012;Zaid, 2015;Madhavaraju et al, 2017;Madhavaraju et al, 2019;Madhavaraju et al, 2021). The sandstones from Zhongbao and Mayinggou formations were plotted in the intermediate and felsic field (Figure 8) from the SiO 2 vs. Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 diagram (Le Bas et al, 1986).…”
Section: Provenance and Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%