1959
DOI: 10.1021/j150575a023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deuterium Exchange between Water and Boehmite (α-Alumina, Monohydrate).

Abstract: The kinetics of the exchange of DzO vapor with crystalline boehmite (particle size ca. 1 p ) were studied froin 85-151". The Berthier exchange ratio C (number of exchangeable atoms in the solid relative to vapor phase) ranged from 0.7 to 2.3. The DzO pressure was varied from 0.41 to 0.95 atm. A rapid initial surface exchange preceded the slower diffusion-controlled exchange with the bulk crystal. After correction for this surface exchange the data followed the appropriate diffusion equation (spherical particle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar slow movement of protons either into or out of goethite was observed in this work and for soil particles by Mora & Barrow (1996). A diffusion mechanism has also been postulated for the reaction of deuterium with an aluminium oxide (Wei & Bernstein, 1959) and for the reaction of protons with an iron oxide (Bérubé et al , 1967). An analogous migration into micropores, boundary layers of domains or defects in the goethite structure has been postulated by Brümmer et al (1988), Fischer et al (1996), Strauss et al (1997b), Gerth (2005) and Mikutta et al (2006) to explain the slow reactions of cations and anions with goethite, while Axe & Trivedi (2002) call this process an intraparticle surface diffusion into microporous sorbents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A similar slow movement of protons either into or out of goethite was observed in this work and for soil particles by Mora & Barrow (1996). A diffusion mechanism has also been postulated for the reaction of deuterium with an aluminium oxide (Wei & Bernstein, 1959) and for the reaction of protons with an iron oxide (Bérubé et al , 1967). An analogous migration into micropores, boundary layers of domains or defects in the goethite structure has been postulated by Brümmer et al (1988), Fischer et al (1996), Strauss et al (1997b), Gerth (2005) and Mikutta et al (2006) to explain the slow reactions of cations and anions with goethite, while Axe & Trivedi (2002) call this process an intraparticle surface diffusion into microporous sorbents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The magnitude of zlE is comparable to activation energies reported in some other instances of what is thought to be proton diffusion in oxides, e.g., 3.2 kcal/ mole in MnO2 (9), 13 kcal/mole in cc-A120~. H20 (10), and 4.5 kcal/mole in ice (10). For metal ions in oxides, AE has been found to be roughly an order of magnitude higher, and it is generally higher still for oxide ions, so that this value of AE is consistent with the proposed mechanism involving the diffusion of protons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…H20 (10), and 4.5 kcal/mole in ice (10). For metal ions in oxides, AE has been found to be roughly an order of magnitude higher, and it is generally higher still for oxide ions, so that this value of AE is consistent with the proposed mechanism involving the diffusion of protons.…”
Section: E = Eo" Jr 2303 (Rt/f) Log T'/ --(T --T) /2 --1mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, a rough estimate of the activation energy value for proton diffusion in α‐FeOOH can be made ~0.45 eV. This estimate concurs with the values reported for other materials 0.41 eV (SrTiO 3 ) and 0.42 (CaTiO 3 ), 0.61 eV (Ca(OH) 2 ), and 0.56 eV (α‐AlO(OH)). Furthermore, this study suggests that micro‐Raman spectroscopy can be extended further and utilized for real‐time studies of the proton diffusion activation energy via dehydration processes when possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%