2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deuterium retention in tungsten exposed to low-energy, high-flux clean and carbon-seeded deuterium plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…blisters, however, D is most likely trapped as D 2 gas under high pressure, as the disappearance of the blisters after TDS or after puncturing the blister with the FIB suggests. This conclusion is also supported by the by the results presented in [8]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…blisters, however, D is most likely trapped as D 2 gas under high pressure, as the disappearance of the blisters after TDS or after puncturing the blister with the FIB suggests. This conclusion is also supported by the by the results presented in [8]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is not easy to interpret the absence of blistering on the not N-implanted W sample after D loading at 500 K, since no comparable experimental conditions (ion energy, temperature and fluence) can be found in literature. It was reported that the critical temperature for blister suppression is 700 K [18], however, the ion flux in that work was much higher than the present one. A corresponding check of this issue is planned for the future.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The manufacturer quoted a purity of better than 99.99 wt%, which is roughly ten times better than the purity of other standard commercial products. It was reported that commercial SC tungsten with a purity of 99.9 wt% has a H impurity content ranging from 0.02 to 0.1 at% [15,16]. Hence, it is reasonable to assume that the H content in the as-delivered SC tungsten samples used in this study was less than 0.01 at%.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 93%