Deuteron stripping to the single particle states of 17O

Cooper, M. D.; Hornyak, W.F.; Roos, P.G.

doi:10.1016/0375-9474(74)90003-7

Cited by 88 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and s 1/2 scaling factors with the An&Cai + Watson case is 1.19 (6) and is an estimate of the relative spectroscopic factors between the two transfer reactions. The compatibility between the factors is in agreement with the expected single particle behaviour of the residual nucleus and the unitary spectroscopic factors present in literature [35,36].…”

Section: Commissioning Withsupporting

confidence: 89%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The MUGAST-AGATA-VAMOS campaign : set-up and performance

Assié,

Clément,

Lemasson

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The MUGAST-AGATA-VAMOS set-up at GANIL combines the MUGAST highly-segmented silicon array with the state-of-the-art AGATA array and the large acceptance VAMOS spectrometer. The mechanical and electronics integration copes with the constraints of maximum efficiency for each device, in particular γ-ray transparency for the silicon array. This complete set-up offers a unique opportunity to perform exclusive measurements of direct reactions with the radioactive beams from the SPIRAL1 facility. The performance of the set-up is described through its commissioning and two examples of transfer reactions measured during the campaign. High accuracy spectroscopy of the nuclei of interest, including cross-sections and angular distributions, is achieved through the triple-coincidence measurement. In addition, the correction from Doppler effect of the γ-ray energies is improved by the detection of the light particles and the use of two-body kinematics and a full rejection of the background contributions is obtained through the identification of heavy residues. Moreover, the system can handle high intensity beams (up to 10 8 pps). The particle identification based on the measurement of the time-of-flight between MUGAST and VAMOS and the reconstruction of the trajectories is investigated.

show abstract

Section: Commissioning Withsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The depth of the central and spin-orbit terms are adjusted to reproduce the energy of the d 5/2 ground state and the s 1/2 excited state in 17 O. In the DWBA calculations, spectroscopic factors equal to unity are fixed for both states, in agreement with previous measurements [35,36].…”

Section: Commissioning Withsupporting

confidence: 52%

The MUGAST-AGATA-VAMOS campaign : set-up and performance

Assié,

Clément,

Lemasson

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the calculation, the standard collective form factors were applied and the parameter set in [11] was employed for the optical potential. The "matter" deformation length deduced in this way is δ M = 0.77±0.07 fm which corresponds to a moderate mass deformation of β M = 0.23 ± 0.02.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing of the RIKEN-ATOMKI CsI(Tl) array in the study of 22, 23O nuclear structure

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The paper reports on the test of the newly developed RIKEN-ATOMKI CsI(Tl) array. It is demonstrated that high-quality detectors with excellent light collection efficiency and narrow resolution distribution could be produced. The setup has been commissioned in the study of the reaction of 22 O + CD2. In the present paper, we summarize the results mainly on the (d, d ) channel. From the cross section for the transition between the ground state and the first 2 + state, we could deduce the "matter" deformation parameter to be βM = 0.23 ± 0.02 by distorted wave analysis. Comparing this data with previous measurements it can be concluded that 22 O isotope has moderate and similar neutron and proton deformations.PACS. 25.70.Hi Transfer reactions -27.30.+t 20 ≤ A ≤ 38 -29.30.Kv X-and gamma-ray spectroscopy -29.30.Ep Charged-particle spectroscopy

show abstract

“…The experimental data are from Ref. [24]. q 2 α /2µ α , where q α is the relative momentum between particle α and the c.m.…”

Section: Model 2 -Energy-dependent Optical Potentialsmentioning

confidence: 99%