Deutsche Raumordnungsplanung in der AWZ – Wegweiser oder Fluchtweg?

Janssen, Gerold

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11153-2_7

Cited by 1 publication

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As one of the earliest examples, German MSP in the EEZ, initiated in 2004 and established in 2009, appeared as part of mediating trade-offs between wind energy policies, especially those regarding nature conservation [13,44,45]. The update to the German MSP in 2021 was initiated by the responsible Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (BMI) with the support of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) [46].…”

Section: Case Study Selection: Marine Spatial Planning Process In Ger...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the same time, departmental coordination occurred at the federal level during the planning process, resulting in the second draft, which introduced changes that were received with surprise by some stakeholders, as voiced and discussed in a public technical discussion in a committee of the German Bundestag [44]. With departmental coordination, although many interests brought forward have been taken note of [106], at the same time, it appears that interests have been balanced once again at the regulatory level.…”

Section: Implications Of Policy Dynamics For Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Implications Of Policy Dynamics For Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The process of weighing up why which targets are preferred or withdrawn apparently is partly perceived as being non-transparent by stakeholders [44]. Yet, spatial planning is also described as being part of the formative administration, whereby sounding out sustainability goals is a case of administrative decisions [44]. This assignment and under-standing of spatial planning being rather an administrative act at the federal level raise the question of planning itself, as well as undergoing public consultation.…”

Section: Implications Of Policy Dynamics For Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…What reasons have led to a possible shift in power over time and what are the implications for fair and transparent planning processes? [13,44,45]. The update to the German MSP in 2021 was initiated by the responsible Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (BMI) with the support of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) [46].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Can MCDA Serve Ex-Post to Indicate ‘Winners and Losers’ in Sustainability Dilemmas? A Case Study of Marine Spatial Planning in Germany

Weber

Köppel

2022

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria decision analyses (MCDAs) have been developed to support and evaluate decision-making on multi-layered problems. The benefit lies in creating transparency, among other benefits, especially in tackling divergent stakeholder interests. Within the energy transition, area shortage can lead to sustainability trade-offs, calling for the reconciliation of planning processes and satisfactory compromises. While ex ante MCDAs complement planning, the ex post consideration of processes has been less widely studied. Using a case study of offshore wind energy (OWP) within German marine spatial planning, we investigated the shifting weights of sustainability criteria and stakeholder interests. A multi-criteria approach (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE)) addressed how decision-making can be iteratively traced, and the winners and losers indicated in sustainability dilemmas, such as between climate and biodiversity implications. Findings illustrate that stakeholders are divided in the green-on-green dilemma. The ‘winners’ embrace the branches of energy and climate protection. It remains a question though for ‘losers’ how weighting decisions of sustainability goals can be detrimental, such as ‘good environmental status’, and what kind of balancing occurs. How compromises are found, such as through transparency and solid justification, is crucial in satisfactorily solving trade-offs for public interests. PROMETHEE makes revealing stakeholder constellations within policy dynamics feasible, though assuming there is the will to work multidisciplinarily within future planning decisions.

show abstract

Section: Case Study Selection: Marine Spatial Planning Process In Ger...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Implications Of Policy Dynamics For Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%