2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74730-9_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developer-Centric Knowledge Mining from Large Open-Source Software Repositories (CROSSMINER)

Abstract: Deciding if an OSS project meets the required standards for adoption is hard, and keeping up-to-date with a rapidly evolving project is even harder. Making decisions about quality and adoption involves analysing code, documentation, online discussions, and issue trackers. There is too much information to process manually and it is common that uninformed decisions have to be made with detrimental effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach, however neglected several semantic-based repositories when they built the component-based and user-based profiles. Amongst the conducted exertions in constructing knowledge-based recommender systems, CROSSMINER initiative [34] established a large-scale project where authors automatically collect resources and components from various open source repositories and delivering them to the developers in terms of recommendations using built knowledge-based RS. The outcomes of this initiative are depicted in [12,35,36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach, however neglected several semantic-based repositories when they built the component-based and user-based profiles. Amongst the conducted exertions in constructing knowledge-based recommender systems, CROSSMINER initiative [34] established a large-scale project where authors automatically collect resources and components from various open source repositories and delivering them to the developers in terms of recommendations using built knowledge-based RS. The outcomes of this initiative are depicted in [12,35,36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… There are many other tools providing different kinds of comprehensive views of software development. Some of them are: Complicity ( Neu et al, 2011 ), RepoGrams ( Rozenberg et al, 2016 ), CROSSMINER ( Bagnato et al, 2017 ), Kibble ( Apache, 2022 ), SmartSHARK ( Trautsch et al, 2017 ), Augur ( Goggins, 2022 ), etc. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%