2018
DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Community–Academic Partnership to Promote Mental Health Among Underserved Preadolescent Girls in Boston, Massachusetts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Food4Thought used the community participatory model to recognize identities and strengths within the community, build on existing resources, and attain a balance between research and action [16][17][18]. After the program, the Genesis Club kitchen unit changed and expanded their menu to include more culturally varied and vegetarian meals.…”
Section: Reflections On Academic-community Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food4Thought used the community participatory model to recognize identities and strengths within the community, build on existing resources, and attain a balance between research and action [16][17][18]. After the program, the Genesis Club kitchen unit changed and expanded their menu to include more culturally varied and vegetarian meals.…”
Section: Reflections On Academic-community Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Boston, staff from Strong Women Strong Girls and researchers from Harvard's School of Public Health participated in a year-long community-based participatory research academy. The result was a project to understand and address the mental health experiences and needs of women and girls in underserved communities (4).…”
Section: Principles Of Community-based Participatory Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, CBPR is action-based and oriented to support and enhance strategic actions for community transformation and social change [18]. It suits healthcare problems among culturally vulnerable and underserved people [19]. A systematic review and metaanalysis showed that community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia led to positive outcomes regarding their functionality and rehospitalization [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%