2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
675
2
31

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 752 publications
(731 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
23
675
2
31
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated earlier, cognitive presence was not explored in this study. Therefore it was decided that a more recent instrument developed by Arbaugh et al, (2008), would not be used. Many of the items on that instrument incorporated cognitive presence, and authors of that paper noted that some of the survey items were more highly correlated with cognitive presence than with teaching presence.…”
Section: Measuring Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated earlier, cognitive presence was not explored in this study. Therefore it was decided that a more recent instrument developed by Arbaugh et al, (2008), would not be used. Many of the items on that instrument incorporated cognitive presence, and authors of that paper noted that some of the survey items were more highly correlated with cognitive presence than with teaching presence.…”
Section: Measuring Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content analysis of online interactions and social networks have been used to measure CoI in online courses, while survey instruments have been the main methods used to assess student perceptions of teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online courses Rourke et al, 2001;Shea et al, 2003;Arbaugh & Benbunan-Fich, 2006;Arbaugh & Hwang, 2006;Arbaugh et al, 2008;Shea, Hayes, Vickers, Gozza-Cohen et al, 2010). The surveys found in the literature were developed for online courses and were not representative of teaching and learning in an online program.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first offering and evaluation of the program, it became apparent that the components of the CoI framework, previously proposed and analyzed in online courses, would benefit from being expanded to encompass online interactions in an online program (Kumar et al, 2011). This article attempts to measure student perceptions of online interactions in the first year of the second offering of the online professional doctorate by adapting the CoI survey that was validated by Arbaugh et al (2008). The description of survey development and the results could be useful to educators engaged in online programs guided by the CoI framework and will further provide insight for all those engaged in online teaching and learning or professional doctorates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Community Inquiry framework (Arbaugh et al, 2008;Garrison & Anderson, 2003; is considered one of the most promising schemes of modeling online teaching. As a broad and integrated model, it explains successful teaching, allowing the research and the monitoring of learning processes in a collaborative, interactive and constructivist approach.…”
Section: Self-learning Skills and The Coi Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%