2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a concept of a context-aware common operational picture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulationbased testing would serve as the first approach, e.g., using cross-border simulator environments [27]. Further evaluation could then be focused on genuine exercises, which would examine the social context of the emergency response, the interactions of end users with NG-SRW, and how NG-SRW supports wider communication and information exchange [36]. Importantly, the current application does not include the use of Satellite Aperture Radar and other remote sensing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulationbased testing would serve as the first approach, e.g., using cross-border simulator environments [27]. Further evaluation could then be focused on genuine exercises, which would examine the social context of the emergency response, the interactions of end users with NG-SRW, and how NG-SRW supports wider communication and information exchange [36]. Importantly, the current application does not include the use of Satellite Aperture Radar and other remote sensing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because intended users sometimes fail to embrace SDSS, it has been suggested that SDSS should incorporate social aspects involved in SDSS design, development, testing, and use. Socio-psychological aspects of the use of SDSS in creating common operational pictures are also important, concerning, for instance, information overload and the suitability of different communication methods to convey the information in the SDSS [36].…”
Section: Scientific Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He distinguishes three levels on which information can be shared: the syntactic level of factual information , the semantic level of interpretations and the pragmatic level of implications that interpreted facts may have for the interests of other actors involved. Likewise, crisis management scholars have pointed out that translation of the inherent meaning of terms is generally needed, because meanings and implications of the information transferred must be exchanged and coordinated as well (Kalkman, Kerstholt, & Roelofs, 2018; Luokkala, Nikander, Korpi, Virrantaus, & Torkki, 2017; Merkus et al., 2017; Van de Walle, Brugghemans, & Comes, 2016; Wolbers & Boersma, 2013). Others have argued that interests have to be negotiated between collaboration partners (Ansell et al., 2010; Wimelius & Engberg, 2015), which means that the contextual meaning of information must be transformed .…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A COP is, as defined by [16], an operational picture shared by several partners during a particular operation. Its goal is to enables a shared Situation Awareness (SA) within the collaboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This COP can be displayed through the use of a GIS. According to [16], such an information system is a powerful tool to support SA, in particularly during crisis situation where almost all relevant information are spatial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%