2012
DOI: 10.7158/d11-136.2012.18.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a conceptual model for the effective assessment of individual student learning in team-based subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Kolmos and Holgaard (2007) suggests that such group-based exams assess students on complex knowledge, but also helps them relect on their scientiic work and the team processes. This way of assessing students is also aligned with a study on collaborative assessment, which pointed to the importance of clarity in expected learning outcomes and opportunities for each student to demonstrate their learning (Elliot et al 2012).…”
Section: Pbl As Cases and Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Kolmos and Holgaard (2007) suggests that such group-based exams assess students on complex knowledge, but also helps them relect on their scientiic work and the team processes. This way of assessing students is also aligned with a study on collaborative assessment, which pointed to the importance of clarity in expected learning outcomes and opportunities for each student to demonstrate their learning (Elliot et al 2012).…”
Section: Pbl As Cases and Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 While the educational benefits of cooperative learning and teamwork are well documented, 13 assessing the learning of individuals that contribute to a team project remains a challenge. As described in Eliot et al, 14 students, instructors and accrediting bodies are still grappling with determining which assessment tools are most appropriate to determine an individual's grade in a team setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals in a group assessment are traditionally awarded a group mark which may be unfair to students. To gauge the breadth and depth of the individual's learning, academics need to provide the opportunity to students to demonstrate their individual state of learning [14,72]. Individual contributions need to be reflected in the assessment design to avoid free-riding [73].…”
Section: Citation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%