2011
DOI: 10.2172/1031953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Cost Model and Methodology to Estimate Capital Costs for Thermal Energy Storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employing the above cost rates, for a two-tank molten salt thermal storage system shows a total cost of $26.72/kWh t , which comes close to the $26.22/kWh t value reported in Ref. [69].…”
Section: De-fg36-08go18146 Research and Development For Novel Tes Syssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Employing the above cost rates, for a two-tank molten salt thermal storage system shows a total cost of $26.72/kWh t , which comes close to the $26.22/kWh t value reported in Ref. [69].…”
Section: De-fg36-08go18146 Research and Development For Novel Tes Syssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The models assume a plant life of 30 years and the geographic location used is Daggett, CA, where the annual DNI is among the highest in the U.S. The HTF used in the CSP plant integrated with Rankine power cycle corresponds to 60% NaNO 3 -40%KNO 3 (Solar Salt) [69] while that used in CSP plant integrated with s-CO2 power cycle corresponds to KCl-MgCl 2 [72].…”
Section: De-fg36-08go18146 Research and Development For Novel Tes Sysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 12, the fluid level of the hot storage tank is maintained at the maximum (10 m) over several Figure 13 illustrates the comparison of total available wind energy utilization of the system between using and not using DH and TES. The total energy utilization is defined by Equation (21). The result shows that the daily utilizations of the WPP system (without using DH and TES) keep at a very low level (from 8.3% to 58.8%), while the daily utilizations of the WTES system are much higher (from 65.0% to 100.0%).…”
Section: Operation and Performance Of The Integrated Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molten salt is chosen for energy storage because it is recognized as one of the best HTF in TES [18,19], and the low cost of molten salt TES (MSTES) makes the projects economically applicable. The two-tanks MSTES system option has a unit cost of $10-20/kWh depending on storage capacity [20,21]. The concept of wind power utilizing direct thermal energy conversion and TES was proposed and studied by Okazaki [22], in which a cost estimation of the wind powered TES system becoming the most economical system than that of conventional wind power was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation