Developing a dynamic model of anomalous experiences and function in young people with or without psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol

Abstract

IntroductionAnomalous experiences are common within the general population, but the frequency and intensity is increased in young people with psychosis. Studies have demonstrated that perceptual biases towards noticing these phenomena plays a role, but the way one thinks about one’s experience (metacognition) may also be relevant. While poor metacognitive function has been theoretically associated with anomalous experiences, this relationship is currently unclear. However, metacognition may work along a continuum with various metacognitive levels, many of which have been demonstrated as impaired in psychosis. These metacognitive components may interact via processes that maintain poor metacognition across levels, and that potentially impact both what people do in their everyday lives (functional outcome) and how people feel about their everyday lives (subjective recovery outcome) in young people with psychosis compared with healthy control participants.Methods and analysisThis study will investigate the association and contribution of metacognition to anomalous experiences and outcome measures cross-sectionally and longitudinally in a 36-month follow-up. First, young people with psychosis will be compared with healthy control participants on selected measures of anomalous experience, metacognition, and function, using analysis of covariance to identify group differences. Next, the relationship between metacognitive components and processes will be explored, including processes connecting the different components, using regression analyses. Finally, mediation analyses will be used to assess the predictive value of metacognitive measures on outcome measures, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally at 36 months, while controlling for symptoms and cognition.Ethics and disseminationEthical and Health Research Authority approval has been obtained through Camberwell St. Giles Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 17/LO/0055). This research project will be reported within a PhD thesis and submitted for journal publication. Once key predictive components of poor outcome in psychosis are identified, this study will develop a series of dynamic models to understand influences on outcome for young people with psychosis.

Cognitive and metacognitive factors predict engagement in employment in individuals with first episode psychosis

“…Participants completed measures of functional capacity, self-reported work hours, IQ, and symptoms. They also completed additional assessments (see Wright et al, 2018b). For the main analyses, we excluded participants who were engaged in childcare (60% of those excluded were female) as this may have prevented them being employed.…”

Three-Year Follow-Up Study Exploring Metacognition and Function in Individuals With First Episode Psychosis

“…This was a longitudinal follow-up study exploring the contribution of metacognitive ability to functional outcome at 3-year follow-up with individuals with First Episode Psychosis. Full details of the study design and ethical approval is provided in the protocol (71). Details of the baseline study are provided in an earlier publication (32).…”

A participatory research study to explore the healing potential of children's anomalous experiences

“…Anomalous experiences in young people can be considered as sense-making and coping strategies, influenced by 'that esoteric content in movies and computer games [that] explain why these young adults prefer to attribute agency to ghosts, spirits and demons rather than Gods' (Visuri, 2019, 151). Anomalous experiences of children are measured and modelled against diagnostic criteria, within closed medical contexts (see Wright et al, 2018), through the lens of epidemiological studies which provide 'the most consistent data, suggesting that some early anomalous experiences, such as auditory hallucinations, can be predictive of later psychiatric illness in adulthood' (Debanne et al, 2009).…”