Abstract. Major hazard prevention is a main challenge given that it is specifically
based on information communicated to the public. In France, preventive
information is notably provided by way of local regulatory documents.
Unfortunately, the law requires only few specifications concerning their
content; therefore one can question the impact on the general population
relative to the way the document is concretely created. Ergo, the purpose of
our work is to propose an analytical methodology to evaluate preventive risk
communication document effectiveness. The methodology is based on
dependability approaches and is applied in this paper to the Document d'Information Communal sur les Risques Majeurs (DICRIM;
in English, Municipal Information Document on Major Risks). DICRIM has to be made by mayors and addressed to the public to provide information on
major hazards affecting their municipalities. An analysis of law compliance
of the document is carried out thanks to the identification of regulatory
detection elements. These are applied to a database of 30 DICRIMs. This
analysis leads to a discussion on points such as usefulness of the missing elements.
External and internal function analysis permits the identification
of the form and content requirements and service and technical functions of
the document and its components (here its sections). Their results are used
to carry out an FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis), which allows us to
define the failure and to identify detection elements.
This permits the evaluation of the effectiveness of form and content of each components
of the document. The outputs are validated by experts from the different
fields investigated. Those results are obtained to build, in future works, a
decision support model for the municipality (or specialised consulting firms)
in charge of drawing up documents.