2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
170
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
170
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Further evidence of its reliability and validity are provided in Table 1, which presents the standard estimate values, Cronbach's alpha, and average variance extracted scores of different factors' obtained (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and inter-construct correlation values. The reliabilities of the individual dimensions ranged from 0.791 to 0.918, which exceeds the recommended level of 0.7 [53,67,68]. The AVE of all the latent variables was greater than the acceptable limit of 0.5, which further supports the convergent validity of the construct.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further evidence of its reliability and validity are provided in Table 1, which presents the standard estimate values, Cronbach's alpha, and average variance extracted scores of different factors' obtained (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and inter-construct correlation values. The reliabilities of the individual dimensions ranged from 0.791 to 0.918, which exceeds the recommended level of 0.7 [53,67,68]. The AVE of all the latent variables was greater than the acceptable limit of 0.5, which further supports the convergent validity of the construct.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The reason for using TFNs in this study is that they are a suitable tool for formulating decision problems and modeling decision makers' vague and incomplete judgments. Moreover, it is easy and convenient for experts or decision makers to apply and calculate the criteria weight and normalization [32,[67][68][69][70]. The scales and related TFNs are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight refers to the standard is as follow formula (3) and (4) With respect to the addition, the multiplication and the scalar-multiplication of triangular fuzzy number in accordance with classical mathematical calculation rule, evaluation factors of triangular fuzzy number described more objective than traditional scoring assignment method. Triangular fuzzy number and scoring assignment respectively express road traffic safety evaluation indexes showed in Table 1 [12], [13]. (6) Final weight of each evaluation factors i w , can be sorted…”
Section: The Weight Of the Index I Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to provide work safety in workplaces, such as risk management, are not only important for the health of workers but also inevitable managerial activities for economic and financial performance, productivity of the facility and the quality and continuity of production [7]. Because of the hazardous nature of construction work, occupational safety is a serious problem in the construction industry.…”
Section: Safety Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%