2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a labelled object-relational constraint database architecture for the projection operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, although the description of the set of constraints can be a hard task, it is done once and applied to every set of data. FABIOLA also provides an easy language to define the constraints based on the query language of Constraint Databases [9,10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although the description of the set of constraints can be a hard task, it is done once and applied to every set of data. FABIOLA also provides an easy language to define the constraints based on the query language of Constraint Databases [9,10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint Optimisation Problems (COPs) have already been used to detect the alignment between the expected and the observed behaviour in model-based diagnosis [31,32], and specifically, when the behaviour is described by means of business process models [33,34,35]. These works used the concept of reified constraints as a mechanism to assign a Boolean value to the constraints included in the model [33], being possible that a constraint that cannot be satisfied during the CSP resolution can be relaxed.…”
Section: Constraint and Optimisation Problems In A Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal Structure of the CDB The storage proposal in Gómez-López et al (2009) presents a framework focused on storing the constraints as objects indexed by the variables contained within; hence, when a CDB is created, three auxiliary tables are also automatically created (Constraints, Variables, and Constraints/Variables), the last of which describes the relation of each constraint with its variables. These tables ( Fig.…”
Section: Orcdb Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences added in the ORCDB are based on the attributes (constraints, variables of the constraints, or classic attributes) involved in the list of obtained attributes as introduced (Gómez-López et al 2009). It is only necessary to redefine the syntax of the projection over constraint variable attributes .at c i :v j /, and there are two different ways to obtain the evaluation of this type attribute, either in an extensional or in an intensional form.…”
Section: Projection Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%