Developing a Performance Evaluation Framework for Public Private Partnership Projects

Ahmad, Zeeshan; Mubin, Sajjad; Masood, Rehan; Ullah, Fahim; Khalfan, Malik

doi:10.3390/buildings12101563

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 115 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Work teams that collaborate with one another primarily function autonomously of their parent corporation. As per findings [4,[31][32][33] and recommendations [25,27,34], due to its improved adaptability and flexibility, a decentralized organization is more attentive to customer demands. The proliferation of decision-making centers encourages flexibility, and structural modification to accommodate special demands is facilitated by adaptability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The project delivery system has a large effect in determining the quality of a project. Strategic plans determined by the owner in the project initiation phase must ensure that project performance indicators in the form of cost and quality as well as time are accomplished. A concept of partnering that is well-managed and planned from the initiation phase will determine the quality of the construction project. Increasing the maturity of partnering is needed in order to achieve better project performance indicators. The concept of partnering in integrated and non-integrated projects has a different pattern. This study intends to discuss the concept of partnering and then recommend several key strategies according to the project life cycle. Research this study is quantitative, analyzing secondary data in the form of weekly meetings and project reports with the comparative method and cause-and-effect analysis. The results show that in the phase above 51% of ongoing projects, there is a significant difference in the pattern of partnering between integrated and non-integrated projects. In order to improve deeper partnering, this research reveals several prerequisites that must be met in order to carry out effective partnering in non-integrated projects. This research may benefit owners, contractors, and stakeholders who want to develop their understanding and knowledge of the concepts of partnering and the maturity of partnering, which will be new strategies for developing and improving project delivery systems. This study focuses on a topic from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically partnership for the goal.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Transfer -A DBFOT model incorporates the private sector's investment in the development, design, financing, operation and maintenance of a project that can be used publicly for a specified duration, followed by the facilities being transferred to the domain [19]. The Lahore Ring Road (Southern Loop) project and the Lahore-Sheikhupura-Faisalabad Dual Carriageway are two prominent instances of projects carried out on BOT or DBFOT mode in Pakistan [20]. Consumers pay the fee that was specified during the bid submission process to the private organization.…”

Section: Types Of Ppp Models In Transportationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Public Private Partnership in Transportation Projects and Risk Identification: A Review

2024

IRJMETS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public-Private-Partnerships play a vital role in the implementation of wide-ranged projects, such as roads, bridges, or highways, to be accomplished by funding provided by private entities which involves social, economic, political risks, with financial risk being the central theme of this paper. The focus is to explore the strategic schemes implemented by different countries in the case studies which determine a strong co-relation between the success and failure of infrastructure PPP projects with various factors such as traffic, cost, and revenue. The results indicate the nature of risks and uncertainty associated with different types of PPP projects and the careful consideration of financial factor in overcoming the challenges faced in the implementation of strategic models. In conclusion, the significance of financial risk assessment is highlighted and further research and application of predictive modeling in the field of transportation is encouraged.

show abstract

“…A similar PPP mode DBFO with no transfer phase is more efficient in terms of cost and time for PPP infrastructure projects [35]. Notable examples of projects executed on BOT or DBFOT mode in Pakistan are the Lahore Ring Road (Southern Loop) project and the Lahore-Sheikhupura-Faisalabad Dual Carriageway [36]. In order to address the failure of demand forecast, attract investors and promote privatization and investment by the private sector, BTO (risk sharing) and BTO (adjusted) modes were introduced and adopted by the Korean Government for the construction and rehabilitation of railway-related projects.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of Various Execution Modes and Their Respective Risks for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Infrastructure Projects

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The public–private partnership (PPP) based model for the execution of infrastructure projects originated from Anglo-Saxon countries and was initially used in 1977 by the United Kingdom (U.K). Since then, its popularity has increased worldwide. Earlier studies by researchers and many other professional sectors and departments have introduced PPP contracts into different execution modes like Build, Operate, and Transfer (BOT); Build, Own, Operate, and Transfer (BOOT); and Build, Lease, and Transfer (BLT), etc. All definitions of PPP contracts are different but have a few common characteristics and risks. Previously, numerous pieces of literature were available on these common risks for various execution modes of PPP contracts. However, each PPP mode still has unique risks that must be identified to understand and successfully implement the PPP projects properly. This paper fills the gap mentioned above and aims to identify various commonly used PPP execution modes in infrastructure projects and their corresponding risks after placing the different PPP execution modes into four (04) different categories. Identified risks for the corresponding PPP categories were also divided into seven (07) stages of the PPP life cycle. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather information from thirty-four (34) PPP experts worldwide. Accordingly, interviews are transcribed and processed for thematic analysis in academic NVIVO software. These identified risks are further placed in the respective PPP category for the convenience and better understanding of the study’s outcome to the users and for the subsequent prioritization and allocation of these identified risks accordingly to the PPP parties during the finalization of the PPP execution mode.

show abstract

Developing a Performance Evaluation Framework for Public Private Partnership Projects

Cited by 9 publications

References 115 publications

Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects

Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects

Analysis of Public Private Partnership in Transportation Projects and Risk Identification: A Review

Identification of Various Execution Modes and Their Respective Risks for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Infrastructure Projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About