Developing a Reference Model for Open Data Capability Maturity Assessment

Çaldağ, Murat Tahir; Gökalp, Ebru

doi:10.1002/9781119821779.ch6

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Assessment of the five research questions presents the need of a standardized and theoretically grounded road-map on OGD assessment domain, which includes implementation, usage, publishment and maintainability of OGD. To satisfy the requirement, the well-accepted models (Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Capability Maturity Model Integration) in the literature on process improvement can be used as foundation (Çaldağ and Gökalp, 2022; Ehsan et al. , 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The maturity of open government data maturity: a multivocal literature review

Çaldağ

Gökalp

2022

AJIM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe aim of this study is to provide administrators in government institutions a roadmap to achieve benefits of open government data (OGD) by reviewing and classifying studies with assessment or maturity models (MMs) in the OGD domain with a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR).Design/methodology/approachTo achieve this goal, the authors conducted an MLR that includes data from not only the formal literature but also the grey literature (e.g. white papers and online documents).FindingsOut of 3,569 sources, 81 studies were selected by following the elimination scheme and assessing sources by relevance and methodology. As a result of the quality assessment of the identified MMs based on predefined criteria, unambiguity, comparability, repeatability, completeness, clearness and objectivity, it was observed that there are a limited number of MMs in this domain and none of them fully satisfies the requirements.Originality/valueThis study is likely the first MLR on OGD domain. This MLR serves as a first step for future research on OGD assessment and MMs by presenting the need to establish a holistic approach covering all OGD dimensions, creation of an objective assessment method, prescriptive properties, and empirical evaluation demonstrating the applicability and usefulness at different scope levels.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The maturity of open government data maturity: a multivocal literature review

Çaldağ

Gökalp

2022

AJIM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[19][20][21] CMMI and SPICE are used as evaluative and comparative basis for process assessment and improvement. The observed benefits of these models and standards, such as cost savings, more involved employees, improved and predictable quality, and increased productivity, generating a consistency of process capture and use, 22 lead to the adaptation of the same approach to domains other than software development such as Medical, 23 Automotive, 24 Government, 25 Open data, 26,27 Data Science, [28][29][30] Big Data, 31 Digital Transformation, 32,33 and Industry 4.0. 34 Although researchers are attempting to develop a prescribed and systematic way of improving SPL processes, 35 there are a limited number of studies related to measuring SPL process capability maturity in the literature, [36][37][38][39][40] and none of the existing studies is developed based on a well-known process capability maturity model or standard.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A reference model for software product line capability assessment

Gökalp

Çalişkanbaş

Kocyigit

2023

J Software Evolu Process

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Software Product Line (SPL) approach receives more attention due to the observed benefits, such as cost reduction, quality improvements, and reduced delivery time. Although organizations are aware of its potential benefits, they face some challenges while creating a clear road map to adopt this approach. Capability maturity models are developed to guide organizations by providing an extensive road map for improvement. Accordingly, we developed a capability maturity model, entitled SPL Capability Maturity Model (SPL‐CMM), to improve an organization's SPL capabilities by enabling the assessment of SPL‐specific processes and providing a guideline for process improvement. SPL‐CMM, developed based on SPICE‐ISO/IEC 330xx standard, has two dimensions of process and capability. The process dimension consists of 16 SPL‐specific processes defined under four process areas: business, architecture, technical, and organization, and the capability dimension has six capability and maturity levels from levels 0 to 5. It is a structured approach assisted by adequate measures with guidance on actions for improvement. A case study was conducted to check the applicability and usefulness of the proposed approach in a software company. The case study results show that SPL‐CMM is applicable for identifying the current state of the SPL process capability and the gaps for process improvement to the next level.

show abstract

Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Based Medical Supply Chain Management

Çaldağ,

Gökalp

2023

Studies in Computational Intelligence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developing a Reference Model for Open Data Capability Maturity Assessment

Cited by 4 publications

References 26 publications

The maturity of open government data maturity: a multivocal literature review

The maturity of open government data maturity: a multivocal literature review

A reference model for software product line capability assessment

Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Based Medical Supply Chain Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About