2013
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): a validation study

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
82
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These included the domains and items from the PMOS questionnaire for hospital use,14 15 a brief description of the themes and subthemes from previous enquiry of the research team investigating patients’ views of safety in general practice9 11 and a brief description of the themes from the literature about threats to patient safety in primary care 3 30–38…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These included the domains and items from the PMOS questionnaire for hospital use,14 15 a brief description of the themes and subthemes from previous enquiry of the research team investigating patients’ views of safety in general practice9 11 and a brief description of the themes from the literature about threats to patient safety in primary care 3 30–38…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the round table, panel members examined the results and reached consensus about which domains to include in the questionnaire. The facilitator used these results to generate example items for each domain where there was not already an existing PMOS questionnaire item 14 15. During the second round-table discussion, panel members considered the example questionnaire items and refined these until consensus was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The more technical components of quality can be measured by a range of methods and indicators (Smith, 2009) but also by the patient perspective through patient-reported outcome measures (Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones, 1998) and patient-reported safety measures (Bjertnaes, Skudal, Iversen, & Lindahl, 2013;McEachan et al, 2013). However, as Donabedian has stressed, the collected information about structures, processes and outcomes are not attributes of quality, but can be used to infer whether quality is good or not (Donabedian & Bashshur, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%