2009
DOI: 10.1080/09544820903149354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a service knowledge reuse framework for engineering design

Abstract: The manufacturing industry is shifting its emphasis from a traditional supplier of products to a supplier of increasingly integrated products and services, or product-service systems (PSSs). The new paradigm of PSS requires new design methodologies and supporting tools for the effective design and delivery of these enhanced services and integrated PSSs. A case study has been carried out to identify and classify service knowledge applied in practice, both in the service operation and in product design. This pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More details on the implications of this are given in Section 6. Similarly, Doultinsou et al [18] present a UML model for the capture of service information for use in engineering design and Zhu et al [79] provide an ontology for maintenance, repair and overhaul services. Like Annamalai et al, both of these models have been developed using systematic processes, and screenshots from early implementations are provided, but neither paper provides detail of how the models have been validated or might be used in engineering processes such as design (Doultinsou et al) or maintenance, repair and overhaul (Zhu et al).…”
Section: Product (Artefact-goods) Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More details on the implications of this are given in Section 6. Similarly, Doultinsou et al [18] present a UML model for the capture of service information for use in engineering design and Zhu et al [79] provide an ontology for maintenance, repair and overhaul services. Like Annamalai et al, both of these models have been developed using systematic processes, and screenshots from early implementations are provided, but neither paper provides detail of how the models have been validated or might be used in engineering processes such as design (Doultinsou et al) or maintenance, repair and overhaul (Zhu et al).…”
Section: Product (Artefact-goods) Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, a variant design industry (for example the aerospace industry) can more readily reuse the design, whereas in this case it is the knowledge and learning from problems that have occurred during operation and transferring this knowledge to the requirements for the design of the next set of equipment that is imperative in particular due to the high downtime cost. This knowledge is also relevant in variant design domains (Wong et al 2007;Jagtap and Johnson 2011;Doultsinou et al 2009). …”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doultsinou et al (2009) with cases with vacuum pumps). Both highlight the need for transfer of knowledge from service to design, showing that this can enhance design through better knowledge of operating conditions.…”
Section: Identification Of Migration Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers such as Goh and McMahon [10], Doultsinou et al [45], Meier et al [7], Igba et al [46] and McMahon and Ball [47], etc. all agree that inservice knowledge is an important ingredient in PD.…”
Section: Continuous Learning and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%