1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001700050130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a STEP-Based Integration Environment to Evaluate the Impact of an Engineering Change on MRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the so-called design for modularity (Exixon 1996, Marshall andLeaney 1999), which is a further development and application of group technology; 2. variant design (Fowler 1996, Mckay et al 1996, which is a method to adapt existing design specifications to satisfy new design goals and constraints; 3. design for manufacture (Gupta et al 1997, Chen et al 1998, which is a concurrent engineering approach for product design; 4. design for management (Nielsen andHolmstrom 1995, Yang andPei 1999), which placed the emphasis on logistic chain management; and 5. computer-aided process planning (Leo and Zhang 1989, Wu and Zhang 1998, Tu et al 2000, which is now more realistically to focus its efforts on the development of a computer decision-support system for process planning and manufacturability approving.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the so-called design for modularity (Exixon 1996, Marshall andLeaney 1999), which is a further development and application of group technology; 2. variant design (Fowler 1996, Mckay et al 1996, which is a method to adapt existing design specifications to satisfy new design goals and constraints; 3. design for manufacture (Gupta et al 1997, Chen et al 1998, which is a concurrent engineering approach for product design; 4. design for management (Nielsen andHolmstrom 1995, Yang andPei 1999), which placed the emphasis on logistic chain management; and 5. computer-aided process planning (Leo and Zhang 1989, Wu and Zhang 1998, Tu et al 2000, which is now more realistically to focus its efforts on the development of a computer decision-support system for process planning and manufacturability approving.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical achievements among these research efforts would be the so-called design for modularity [9,10], variant design [11,12], design for manufacture [13,14], design for production management [15,57] and computer-aided process planning (CAPP) [16][17][18]. Marshall and Leaney [10] developed a systematic approach for product modularity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nielsen et al [15] presented an approach to separate product features and the feature interfaces to simplify the production control activities from a supply chain perspective. Yang et al [57] gave an example of integrating a CAD system with an MRP (Maufacturing Resource Planning) system based on a STEP protocol. Hence, the design choices reduced the impact on the required materials.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of STEP, STEP-based tools and modelling methodologies are widely used in some Internet-based applications, e.g. building an integrated environment (Yang et al 1999) and an Internet-based data exchange framework (Zhang et al 2000).…”
Section: Step-based Generic Dfx Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%