2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00033-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments—an exploratory investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous phase of the ongoing research on the role of the online facilitator, Blignaut and Trollip (2003a) followed a basic contentanalysis methodology to classify instructor postings according to thematic messages (Anderson et al, 2001) and developed a six-category taxonomy of online facilitator interactions. A listing of the six categories, as well as descriptions and examples of the categories appears in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous phase of the ongoing research on the role of the online facilitator, Blignaut and Trollip (2003a) followed a basic contentanalysis methodology to classify instructor postings according to thematic messages (Anderson et al, 2001) and developed a six-category taxonomy of online facilitator interactions. A listing of the six categories, as well as descriptions and examples of the categories appears in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waar de docent meent heldere uitleg opgeschreven te hebben blijft het voor studenten soms toch onduidelijk wat de verwachtingen nu precies zijn (Blignaut & Trollip, 2003;Bullen, 1998). Effectieve manieren om duidelijke verwachtingen te communiceren zijn het geven van voorbeelden van good practice (Bangert, 2004) en het formuleren van rubrics (Conaway, Easton, & Schmidt, 2005).…”
Section: Het E-learning Ontwerp: Vier Clusters Van Ontwerpelementenunclassified
“…Het tijdig antwoorden op vragen vergroot bovendien de kans dat docenten als echte en ondersteunende personen beschouwd worden door studenten. Niet tijdig antwoorden daarentegen vergroot de sociale afstand en verlaagt de motivatie (Baker, 2004;Blignaut & Trollip, 2003). Tijdige en constructieve feedback leidt bovendien tot een betere kwaliteit van de online discussies en studenten hechten er veel waarde aan (Dennen, 2005;Rossman 1999).…”
Section: Het E-learning Ontwerp: Vier Clusters Van Ontwerpelementenunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The instructor reviews every message that is posted and comments where he or she thinks a student has gone astray, or where more discussion is needed. Instructor involvement is important from the students' perspective because it provides a sense of worth, both for the material and for the students' learning of that material [1].…”
Section: Quantitative Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%