Developing a virtual reality application for the improvement of depth perception

Guzsvinecz, Tibor; Kovács, Csaba; Reich, Dominik; Szucs, Veronika; Sik-Lányi, Cecília

doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2018.8639935

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This means that the sensors face each other. The authors of this literature review developed an application with the Kinect v2 and the LMC [ 131 ] and since the study at Stanford did not talk about the interference between the two sensors, it should be mentioned that when testing the application of the authors, it was found out that when the Kinect v2 and LMC is positioned towards each other (which is also the case with the study at Stanford), there is a possibility that the devices interfere with each other in a way that the tracking of the LMC becomes less accurate due to the IR signals from both devices.…”

Section: Discussion: Accuracy and Precisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suitability of the Kinect Sensor and Leap Motion Controller—A Literature Review

Guzsvinecz

Szucs

Sik-Lányi

2019

Sensors

Self Cite

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the need for sensors increases with the inception of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality, the purpose of this paper is to evaluate the suitability of the two Kinect devices and the Leap Motion Controller. When evaluating the suitability, the authors’ focus was on the state of the art, device comparison, accuracy, precision, existing gesture recognition algorithms and on the price of the devices. The aim of this study is to give an insight whether these devices could substitute more expensive sensors in the industry or on the market. While in general the answer is yes, it is not as easy as it seems: There are significant differences between the devices, even between the two Kinects, such as different measurement ranges, error distributions on each axis and changing depth precision relative to distance.

show abstract

Section: Discussion: Accuracy and Precisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suitability of the Kinect Sensor and Leap Motion Controller—A Literature Review

Guzsvinecz

Szucs

Sik-Lányi

2019

Sensors

Self Cite

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Google Cardboard was used by Vichitvejpaisal & Chotine, 51 and the research team of Saraiva, 46 , 47 while VR viewers from Samsung, Shinecon, Oculus, and Zeiss were used in several other research studies. 13 , 50 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 , 71 , 72 , 80 , 89 I- BiT™ system was frequently used (6/48, 12.50%) in the treatment of amblyopia and strabismus. Eastgate et al, 83 Waddingham et al, 84 Cleary et al, 86 Herbison et al, 87 Herbison et al, 88 and Rajavi et al 49 employed I-BiT™ system in amblyopic and strabismic therapy and found the approach effective in the treatment.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, three novel systems (2/48, 4.17%), including the Viston-VRTM system, 47 and NeuroDotVR system 70 were developed to treat myopia, amblyopia, and strabismus, while 3D display screens together with 3D polarized glasses were used (5/48, 10.42%) in a few studies. 45 , 51 , 61 – 63 , 72 , 74 , 79 , 81 Furthermore, Cepeda-Zapata et al 64 did not mention the device or system used in the research in which a VR game theory was proposed by Tan et al 54 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and assessment of amblyopia, strabismus, and myopia treatment and vision training using virtual reality

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Virtual reality is a relatively new intervention that has the potential to be used in the treatment of eye and vision problems. This article reviews the use of virtual reality-related interventions in amblyopia, strabismus, and myopia research. Methods Sources covered in the review included 48 peer-reviewed research published between January 2000 and January 2023 from five electronic databases (ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science). To prevent any missing relevant articles, the keywords, and terms used in the search included “VR”, “virtual reality”, “amblyopia”, “strabismus,” and “myopia”. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two authors to form a narrative synthesis to summarize findings from the included research. Results Total number of 48 references were reviewed. There were 31 studies published on amblyopia, 18 on strabismus, and 6 on myopia, with 7 studies overlapping amblyopia and strabismus. In terms of technology, smartphone-based virtual reality headset viewers were utilized more often in amblyopia research, but commercial standalone virtual reality headsets were used more frequently in myopia and strabismus-related research. The software and virtual environment were mostly developed based on vision therapy and dichoptic training paradigms. Conclusion It has been suggested that virtual reality technology offers a potentially effective tool for amblyopia, strabismus, and myopia studies. Nonetheless, a variety of factors, especially the virtual environment and systems employed in the data presented, must be explored before determining whether virtual reality can be effectively applied in clinical settings. This review is significant as the technology in virtual reality software and application design features have been investigated and considered for future reference.

show abstract

“…writing, drawing, technique and lifestyle, and of course, at complex motion sequences. Modern infocommunication tools play an even more significant role in supporting education [30]- [35], where eye-hand coordination is important factor such as gamification [36], VR based education [37]- [43] project-based teamwork [44] or other visual, interactive systems [45]- [49].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative Analysis of Relationship Between Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Coordination

Kővári¹,

Katona²,

Costescu³

2020

ACTA POLYTECH HUNG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In perception and activity tasks, continuous visual tracking of the performed activity requires continuous eye motion. Besides writing and reading, the cooperative work of eyes and hands is a key factor when drawing and at certain motions (e.g. ball catching or throwing); during the exact execution of motions, eye-hand coordination has the utmost importance. The development of eye-hand coordination plays a key role in education too, regarding several subjects, i.e. writing, drawing, technique and lifestyle, and of course, at complex motion sequences. Modern info-communication tools play an even more significant role in supporting education, where human-computer interfaces similar to the systems introduced in this paper are very significant. In this paper, by analysing certain features describing computer mouse cursor motion, examined during the execution of the Trail Making Task, what correlation is there between visual attention and eye-hand coordination. Based on the statistical correlation analysis results of data, it was determined, that the fixation parameters of eye and hand motion are in negative correlation with visual attention, while the distance between the look and the mouse cursor's motion are not correlated to each other.

show abstract

Developing a virtual reality application for the improvement of depth perception

Cited by 10 publications

References 17 publications

Suitability of the Kinect Sensor and Leap Motion Controller—A Literature Review

Suitability of the Kinect Sensor and Leap Motion Controller—A Literature Review

Design and assessment of amblyopia, strabismus, and myopia treatment and vision training using virtual reality

Quantitative Analysis of Relationship Between Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Coordination

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About