2023
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.122.009453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an Actionable Taxonomy of Persistent Hypertension Using Electronic Health Records

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The digital transformation of medical data presents opportunities for novel approaches to manage patients with persistent hypertension. We sought to develop an actionable taxonomy of patients with persistent hypertension (defined as 5 or more consecutive measurements of blood pressure ≥160/100 mmHg over time) based on data from the electronic health records. METHODS: This qualitative study was a content analysis of clinician notes in the ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously detailed various mechanisms through which patients experience persistent hypertension, such as the lack of intensification in pharmacological treatment, failure to implement prescribed therapies, and non-response to treatment. 10 Building on this, the current study specifically illuminates the mechanisms behind clinicians' failure to treat ambulatory patients with severely elevated BP effectively and explores the reasons for these shortcomings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop a taxonomy for categorizing instances of suboptimal clinician adherence to guidelines in managing patients with markedly elevated BP using real-world data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously detailed various mechanisms through which patients experience persistent hypertension, such as the lack of intensification in pharmacological treatment, failure to implement prescribed therapies, and non-response to treatment. 10 Building on this, the current study specifically illuminates the mechanisms behind clinicians' failure to treat ambulatory patients with severely elevated BP effectively and explores the reasons for these shortcomings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop a taxonomy for categorizing instances of suboptimal clinician adherence to guidelines in managing patients with markedly elevated BP using real-world data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a previously published inductive, systematic approach, [9][10][11][12][13] we conducted a thematic analysis of EHR data to generate a real-world taxonomy of suboptimal clinician guideline adherence scenarios in managing severe hypertension. Then, we postulated plausible reasons/influencing factors/root causes for each taxonomized scenario based on contexts adopted from a previously published metareview of 25 systematic reviews on the factors influencing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.…”
Section: Approach To Thematic Analysis and Taxonomy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a previously published inductive, systematic approach, [10][11][12][13][14] we conducted a thematic analysis of EHR data to generate a pragmatic taxonomy of suboptimal clinician guideline adherence scenarios in managing severe hypertension.…”
Section: Approach To Thematic Analysis and Taxonomy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a pragmatic framework is poised to inform targeted interventions, thus enhancing adherence and patient outcomes.Our study advances the existing body of literature in several ways. We have previously detailed various mechanisms through which patients experience persistent hypertension, such as the lack of intensification in pharmacological treatment, failure to implement prescribed therapies, and nonresponse to treatment 11. Building on this, the current study specifically illuminates the mechanisms behind clinicians' failure to treat ambulatory patients with severely elevated BP effectively and explores the reasons for these shortcomings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%