Developing an arabic questionnaire to assess sensory processing disorders among preschool Egyptian children

Sobhy, Nora; Afsah, Omayma; Baz, Hemmat

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104238

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… All tests developed in the USA in English except SBQ (UK), TSPA (Thailand; language not specified), and Arabic questionnaire (Egypt; Arabic). All studies conducted in the USA except Neil et al 70 (UK), Sutthachai et al 40 (Thailand), and Sobhy et al 97 (Egypt). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All tests developed in the USA in English except the SBQ (UK), TSPA (Thailand; language not specified), and Arabic questionnaire (Egypt; Arabic). All studies conducted in the USA except Neil et al 70 (UK), Sankar and Prema 72 (India), Sutthachai et al 40 (Thailand), and Sobhy et al 97 (Egypt). Abbreviations: ABQ, Auditory Behaviour Questionnaire; ESP, Evaluation of Sensory Processing; GI Ax, Gravitational Insecurity Assessment; SAND, Sensory Assessment for Neurodevelopmental Disorders; SBQ, Sensory Behaviour Questionnaire; SensOR, Sensory Over‐Responsivity Scales; SEQ 1.0, Sensory Experiences Questionnaire Version 1.0; SP, Sensory Profile; SP‐3D:A, Sensory Processing 3‐Dimensions Scale: Assessment; SPM, Sensory Processing Measure; SPM‐S, Sensory Processing Measure‐School; SPS:A, Sensory Processing Scale: Assessment; SPS:I, Sensory Processing Scale: Inventory; SSP, Short Sensory Profile; TSPA, Thai Sensory Patterns Assessment.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All tests developed in the USA in English except the SSQ‐R (Australia) and Arabic questionnaire (Egypt; Arabic). All studies performed in the USA except Dugas et al 77 (Canada), Brown and Dunn 80 (Australia), Sankar and Prema 72 (India), Talay‐Ongan and Wood 94 (Australia), Sobhy et al 97 (Egypt). The shaded cells indicate validity measures were not evaluated in the study.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…None of the assessments had all the measurement properties specified in the COSMIN taxonomy evaluated or reported on 54 . The TIE, 93 ABQ, 87 SBQ, 70 SAND, 81 SSQ‐R, 94 TSPA, 40 and an unnamed Arabic questionnaire 97 had only one study that evaluated psychometric properties of the assessment, although the SAND, TSPA, and the Arabic questionnaire are recently developed tests that are likely to have further studies published. Pooling and synthesis of the data were not possible where only one study evaluated measurement properties of an assessment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection Of An Assessment For Adaptationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Sensory reactivity assessment in children: A systematic review

Watkyns,

Cloete,

Parham

2023

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo identify sensory reactivity assessments published in the literature for children aged 3 to 12 years and evaluate their psychometric properties to select the most appropriate one for adaptation to South Africa, with implications for other low‐ and middle‐income countries.MethodWe addressed the following two review questions. What tests have been published in the literature in the past 30 years to evaluate sensory reactivity with children aged 3 to 12 years? What is the validity and reliability of the tests reported in the studies? The COnsensus‐based standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology was used. We searched eight databases. Two reviewers independently screened and selected the studies.ResultsThe reviewers identified 41 studies, representing 19 assessments. The most common type of assessment was the proxy‐reported caregiver questionnaire. Sensory systems most often assessed were visual, tactile, auditory, and vestibular. Study populations included those with autism spectrum disorder, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and children born preterm. Ratings for measurement properties of most assessments were moderate to low.InterpretationLimited psychometric information was reported, with low ratings for many properties. The Sensory Processing 3‐Dimensions Scale was selected on the basis of its psychometric properties and alignment with best‐practice recommendation to use a caregiver questionnaire and a performance test to assess sensory reactivity.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection Of An Assessment For Adaptationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Sensory reactivity assessment in children: A systematic review

Watkyns,

Cloete,

Parham

2023

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sensory processing profile among a sample of Egyptian children with different types of delayed language development: correlations of different variables

Mohammed,

Elsayed,

Mahmoud

2024

Egypt J Otolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Research on sensory processing, particularly its association with language disorders, has been increasing in recent years, aiming to understand the correlation between language and sensory processing. This study aimed to determine sensory profiles among children aged 36 and 120 months with language disorders (autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD), specific language impairment (SLI), and intellectual disability (ID)) and correlate their language ages with their sensory profile responses. Results The study involved 120 children with language disorders (ASD, ADHD, SLI, and ID), and 30 typically developing children. All children were subjected to assessment by the Sensory Profile and the Preschool Language Scale Fourth Edition (PLS-4) Arabic edition. Based on their sensory profile, children with language disorders are distinguished from typically developing peers. The former has a higher prevalence of sensory modulation disorders as well as atypical emotional and behavioral responses to sensory inputs compared to typically developing children. Children with ASD have the highest atypical sensory responses, followed by those with SLI, ADHD, and ID. A negative correlation was found between some sensory profile scores and receptive language scores. Expressive language was related to oral processing in some subtypes of language disorders. Conclusions The study indicates that detailed sensory processing assessment in children reveals different faces for different types of language disorders.

show abstract

Developing an arabic questionnaire to assess sensory processing disorders among preschool Egyptian children

Cited by 2 publications

References 33 publications

Sensory reactivity assessment in children: A systematic review

Sensory reactivity assessment in children: A systematic review

Sensory processing profile among a sample of Egyptian children with different types of delayed language development: correlations of different variables

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About