2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-4231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an On-Board Traffic-Aware Flight Optimization Capability for Near-Term Low-Cost Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These applications came from existing and proposed FAA development programs, from the final report of the ADS-B IN Aviation Rulemaking Committee, 5 from NASA's research on advanced air traffic services, Air Traffic Management (ATM), and separation technology concepts, 6,7,8 and subsequent determination of "function allocation" alternatives which led to identification of logical combinations and extensions of these concepts. Each concept and application was vetted for its positive attributes -efficiency, flexibility, and return-on-investment, and its potential negative aspects of cost and difficulty in achieving implementation.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications came from existing and proposed FAA development programs, from the final report of the ADS-B IN Aviation Rulemaking Committee, 5 from NASA's research on advanced air traffic services, Air Traffic Management (ATM), and separation technology concepts, 6,7,8 and subsequent determination of "function allocation" alternatives which led to identification of logical combinations and extensions of these concepts. Each concept and application was vetted for its positive attributes -efficiency, flexibility, and return-on-investment, and its potential negative aspects of cost and difficulty in achieving implementation.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 An analysis of how TASAR achieves the goals of low-cost implementation and near-term applicability was presented in 2013. 8 The TASAR concept was developed with several key attributes, shown in Table 1, the combination of which make it unique among flight-optimization concepts and technologies. As a "per-aircraft" capability, TASAR can be implemented by early adopters at a cost-beneficial deployment rate determined by the user and without dependence on other aircraft or users to be TASAR equipped to start realizing a return on investment.…”
Section: A Concept Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,11,12,13 Two safety assessment methodologies compliant with the FAA's Safety Management System were used to determine the Failure Effects Classification (FEC) of TASAR. Method 1, based on ARP 4761 [14], AC 23-1309 [15] and AC 25-1309 [16] for Part 23 and Part 25 aircraft operations, is a traditional system safety process for airborne systems, e.g., TASAR.…”
Section: Safety and Operational Hazards Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In order to test the TASAR concept, NASA Langley Research Center has developed a prototype cockpit-based, flight optimization tool, the Traffic Aware Planner (TAP). 5,6 Designed to operate on a variety of EFB platforms, the tool processes up-to-date data from avionics and the internet, including the aircraft's current route and state, ADS-B IN, winds, convective weather, and special use airspace schedules, to generate conflict-free, flight-optimizing, routechange advisories. The internal architecture and algorithms of TAP's main processor were derived from the NASA Autonomous Operations Planner (AOP), a flight-deck automation system developed to support aircraft selfseparation research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%