2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2008.4720264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and assessing conceptual understanding in materials engineering using written research papers and oral poster presentations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every innovation in engineering education needs to be carefully evaluated and assessed to see if the innovations do indeed lead to the intended outcomes [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . The reasons for creating the iCollaborate MSE modules, quizzes and applications are fundamentally three-fold from the students' perspective: improvement in specific learning outcomes, enhanced interest and motivation, and enriched collaborative learning opportunities [53][54][55][56][57][58][59] . From an engineering education research perspective, this research will help us better understand why students are having difficulties in the course because we will better understand student misperceptions which Page 22.1464.10 also enhances our abilities to provide meaningful concept based experiences within collaborations, improve our ability to focus on troublesome student outcomes and provide additional scaffolding opportunities, and enhance inclusiveness in the classroom.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every innovation in engineering education needs to be carefully evaluated and assessed to see if the innovations do indeed lead to the intended outcomes [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . The reasons for creating the iCollaborate MSE modules, quizzes and applications are fundamentally three-fold from the students' perspective: improvement in specific learning outcomes, enhanced interest and motivation, and enriched collaborative learning opportunities [53][54][55][56][57][58][59] . From an engineering education research perspective, this research will help us better understand why students are having difficulties in the course because we will better understand student misperceptions which Page 22.1464.10 also enhances our abilities to provide meaningful concept based experiences within collaborations, improve our ability to focus on troublesome student outcomes and provide additional scaffolding opportunities, and enhance inclusiveness in the classroom.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past six years several best practices in teaching and learning have been implemented in our Introduction to Materials Engineering course to transform the course from a traditional lecture only course to a course that is centered on conceptual and active learning. Several papers have been published covering various aspects of these changes with some of the changes resulting in improved student learning and engagement while other approaches were less successful [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Most of the elements of a student-centered approach are now present in the course: cooperative learning, case-based teaching, active/inquiry learning, concept learning, problembased learning, and constructive alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a several previous studies, including the development of a Materials Concept Inventory, that have identified and described some student difficulties with understanding atomic bonds and/or their relationship with material properties [1][2][3] . In an initial phase of this study, we administered the Materials Concept Inventory, which covers a wide range of topics, and found similar levels of student difficulties with atomic bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%