2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27046-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Deploying a Patient Safety Program in a Large Health Care Delivery System: You Can’t Fix What You Don’t Know About

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
162
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[353][354][355][356][357][358][359] Therefore, each facility should maintain records that track all adverse events and significant interventions, such as desaturation; apnea; laryngospasm; need for airway interventions, including the need for placement of supraglottic devices such as an oral airway, nasal trumpet, or LMA; positivepressure ventilation; prolonged sedation; unanticipated use of reversal agents; unplanned or prolonged hospital admission; sedation failures; inability to complete the procedure; and unsatisfactory sedation, analgesia, or anxiolysis. 360 Such events can then be examined for the assessment of risk reduction and improvement in patient/family satisfaction.…”
Section: Continuous Quality Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[353][354][355][356][357][358][359] Therefore, each facility should maintain records that track all adverse events and significant interventions, such as desaturation; apnea; laryngospasm; need for airway interventions, including the need for placement of supraglottic devices such as an oral airway, nasal trumpet, or LMA; positivepressure ventilation; prolonged sedation; unanticipated use of reversal agents; unplanned or prolonged hospital admission; sedation failures; inability to complete the procedure; and unsatisfactory sedation, analgesia, or anxiolysis. 360 Such events can then be examined for the assessment of risk reduction and improvement in patient/family satisfaction.…”
Section: Continuous Quality Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this process, the patient safety managers in each facility rate the severity and probability of harm of the event using a Safety Assessment Code (SAC) Matrix. 4 The SAC yields a rating from 1 to 3 for both actual events and close calls (in which significant harm could have been caused but was averted). Actual "SAC 3"-rated events have the highest severity of harm and all SAC 3 events, whether actual or potential, require a root cause analysis, while other lowerrisk events can be reported and documented in a briefer safety report.…”
Section: Root Cause Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[136][137][138][139][140] Therefore, each facility should maintain records that track adverse events such as desaturation, apnea, laryngospasm, the need for airway interventions including jaw thrust or positive pressure ventilation, prolonged sedation, unanticipated use of reversal agents, unintended or prolonged hospital admission, and unsatisfactory sedation/analgesia/anxiolysis. Such events can then be examined for assessment of risk reduction and improvement in patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Continuous Quality Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%