Developing Automation Adoption Readiness Index for Quality Management Focused on Highway Construction

Development of a Performance Index Model for Evaluation of BIM-Based Stakeholder Management Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation

“…Therefore, considering the challenges of performance evaluation of the stakeholder management process being a highly subjective area, the use of fuzzy set theory was found to be suitable. The fuzzy set theory allows a more comprehensible estimation of factors through a fuzzification and defuzzification process that deals with subjectivities and uncertainties [53]. Based on this, fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) was chosen as the modeling method.…”

“…It can handle problems with multiple levels and multiple attributes [51]. Moreover, its ability to handle a Likert scale in a simple questionnaire survey [53], as opposed to using specialized survey instruments in other fuzzy hybrid methods [52], makes it suitable for the requirements and constraints of this study's objectives. An important benefit of using FSE is its robustness in dealing with the limited sample size without compromising the validity of results [55].…”

“…It also reflects the smooth work transition between the execution and O&M teams, thus focusing on improved collaboration and better information flow, aiding the planning, execution, and coordination of maintenance operations [59]. In their work, Brunet, Motamedi [53] point out the importance of communication in easing information availability as a critical factor for productivity gains.…”

A Review on Key Performance Indicators for Measuring Real Estate Project Success

“…The review of the extant literature suggests that the performance evaluation of the construction projects has been gradually shifting beyond the traditional measures. The several researchers suggest that in addition to the iron triangle measures, but the customer satisfaction, budget, schedule, and the project manager's competence should also be considered as the performance evaluation criteria [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The buildings and infrastructure need to be evaluated based on their iron triangle, customer satisfaction, budget, schedule, and project manager competence for the overall success and well-being of their end users.…”

“…The buildings and infrastructure need to be evaluated based on their iron triangle, customer satisfaction, budget, schedule, and project manager competence for the overall success and well-being of their end users. Consequently, the future agenda of the project performance evaluation needs to be more comprehensive and should include not only the iron triangle, but the aforementioned variables such as customer satisfaction, budget, schedule, project manager's capability should be considered as criteria [23,29,30]. Based on the discussion above, the purpose of this research is to conduct a systematic investigation of the KPIs to measure the success of construction projects in order to contribute to apply understanding of effective and the successful ways of delivering such projects.…”