2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2017.2749437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Bidding and Offering Curves of a Price-Maker Energy Storage Facility Based on Robust Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of previous papers [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have modelled price-making ESSs and quantitatively analysed their ability to exercise market power. However, the modelling approaches adopted in these works exhibit certain limitations.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large number of previous papers [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have modelled price-making ESSs and quantitatively analysed their ability to exercise market power. However, the modelling approaches adopted in these works exhibit certain limitations.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, producer i behaves as a price-maker and submits an offer price higher than its actual marginal costs (v i, t λ i, b G , ∀b) to the market at t. v. Each demand participant j submits a decreasing stepwise bid curve (capturing the effect of demand's price elasticity [17,19,20,27,34]) to the market at every period t, consisting of a number of blocks c. The price/quantity bids are time-specific and location-specific parameters, capturing the differentiated preferences of consumers across different time periods and the differentiated geographical conditions. Demand participants are assumed price-takers, bidding based on their actual technoeconomic parameters.…”
Section: Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the solving algorithm, the bi-level optimization model is usually reduced to a mixed-integer linear programming problem using the duality theory and the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions, or through mathematical program equilibrium constraints (MPEC). MPEC approach often imposes a high computational burden due to its complicated mathematical formulation, which makes it challenging to solve for large-scale systems [22]. Focus on the monthly energy market in China, [12] presents a bi-level optimization model for developing optimal bidding strategies of power producer in the monthly sequential contract and balancing markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PQC describes how the market-clearing price changes as the quota of the price maker changes. PQC is at the beginning used for bidding optimization of the generators [3,6,7], and now is also used for demand-side bidding [15,22]. To distinguish the PQCs for generators and demand-side retailers, they are named generation PQC (GPQC) and demand PQC (DPQC), respectively [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation