Developing brand emotions across cultures: effects of self-construal and context

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the nature of brand emotions elicited by advertising stimuli across cultures and the process underlying such emotional experiences. Design/methodology/approach The study uses factorial between-subjects design. Random samples of the populations were solicited from the panels of an international data provider in Norway and Thailand. Findings This research shows that Thai consumers experience more positive socially engaging and disengaging brand emotions and fewer negative socially engaging emotions relative to Norwegian consumers. The effects of culture are mediated by consumers’ self-construal. Social advertising context increases number of positive and negative socially engaging emotions among Thai (but not among Norwegian) consumers. Research limitations/implications The results highlight the importance of incorporating social orientation of emotions and adverting context in cross-cultural studies of brand emotions. The finding that Thai consumers (relative to Norwegian) experience higher levels of atypical for their culture – positive socially disengaging brand emotions requires further research. Practical implications The findings suggest that advertising stimuli need to be adapted to the cultural context. Marketing managers should use extensive pretesting in culturally distinct markets to make sure that advertising evokes brand emotions in line with the strategy. Originality/value Despite extensive research on brand emotions, extant studies on brand emotions across cultures are limited. This study is among the first to advance the understanding of how social orientation of emotions and advertising context underlie experience of brand emotions across cultures.

The effect of service failure severity on brand forgiveness: the moderating role of interpersonal attachment styles and thinking styles

“…That is, secure and anxious attachment styles weaken and strengthen the negative impact of service failure severity on brand forgiveness, whereas an avoidant attachment style plays no significant role. Fourth, prior branding research has shown that thinking styles are valid concepts for understanding the elicitation of salient brand emotions (Jakubanecs et al , 2019), consumers’ reactions to brand extensions (Allman et al , 2019) and brand placement (Hur et al , 2020). Our study also adds to this by showing that holistic and analytic thinking are also valid concepts in service failure contexts: the former weakens, and the latter strengthens, the negative impact of service failure severity on brand forgiveness.…”

Customer gratitude in relationship marketing strategies: a cross-cultural e-tailing perspective

“…Third, while soccer merchandise was ideal for assuring cultural relevancy for the Hispanic market, the research failed to account for the potential influence of the Hispanic shopper’s involvement level with this category. Similarly, given the influence culture has in determining consumers’ behaviors (Cakanlar and Nguyen, 2019; Jakubanecs et al , 2019), this research could be enriched by incorporating Hofstede’s (1980) cultural values to assess their influence on Internet-related behaviors and potential differences across subgroups of online immigrant consumers. Finally, while this study is among the very first to examine the roles of ethnic identity and gratitude in driving online loyalty in an immigrant population, we measured behavioral intentions rather than actual purchase and word-of-mouth behaviors, presenting an opportunity to further examine these issues.…”

Brand engagement in self-concept: a comparative study in Austria, Italy and Poland

“…This may mean that BESC as an individual tendency will also depend on culture or socioeconomic context. Indeed, according to Markus and Kitayama's (1991), Self Construal Theory, culture determines self-construal and individuals from different cultures have reliable differences in self-construal (Jakubanecs et al, 2019).…”